Skip to main content
LawSphereX

AMARPREET SINGH v. PARDEEP K SANDHU ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE FAMILY COURT JAMMU

Court: High Court of Jammu and Kashmir

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court of Jammu and Kashmir judgment dated 2024-06-03. AMARPREET SINGH v. PARDEEP K SANDHU ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE FAMILY COURT JAMMU. Read the...

Judgment text

Sr. No. 34 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU Case:- CCP(S) No. 247/2023 in CM(M) No. 93/2023 Amarpreeet Singh, age 46 years, S/o Gurcharan Singh (Advocate), R/o H. No. 95, Sector 4, Modern Town Digiana, Jammu. ….. Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Gurcharan Singh, Advocate Vs Pardeep K. Sandhu, Additional District Jammu, Family Court, Jammu. . …. Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Rohit Kohli, Advocate Ms. Deepika Singh Rajawat, Advocate Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE ORDER 03. 06. 2024 01. This Court in terms of an order dated 06. 05. 2024 sent for the record of the case just for the sake of satisfaction as to whether the proceedings are being conducted in a proper manner so as to dispel an apprehension of the applicant the father of Miss Minal Kour who is the petitioner in an execution petition pending before the Additional District Judge, Family Court, Jammu. 02.

Perusal of the record of the case shows that the confusion is operating at the level of as to how much of the arrears in actual is payable from the end of the applicant towards the petitioner-daughter, whereas the recurring liability is for payment of Rs. 2 CCP(S) No. 247/2023 in CM(M) No. 93/2023 5,000/- per month from the end of the applicant towards the petitioner-daughter. 03. As per the interim orders passed by the Court below, it seems that both sides have been asked to submit statements of account as to how much amount has been paid to and received from the respective ends to which the applicant seems to have not responded till date and it is reported by the learned counsel for the petitioner-daughter that from her end the requisite statement has been placed on record showing the arrears. 04. This Court is disposing of this matter with a direction unto the applicant to ensure first that recurring monthly maintenance of Rs.

5,000/- payable in favour of the petitioner-daughter is deposited with the Nazir of the Additional District Judge, Family Court, Jammu without any fail and secondly, the court below shall endeavour at its own to figure out from the record and also from the examination of the parties or their respective counsel whosoever, including Advocate-S. Gurcharan Singh, as to how much is actually payable in terms of the arrears and, accordingly, come up with a figure which is found to be arrears recoverable from the applicant’s end and payable towards the petitioner-daughter. 05. The matter is, thus, disposed of. (RAHUL BHARTI) JUDGE JAMMU 03. 06. 2024 Muneesh Muneesh Sharma 2024. 06. 13 11:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.