K.Srinivas Reddy, v. The State of Telangana
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: K. SUJANA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2026-04-21. K.Srinivas Reddy, v. The State of Telangana. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
[ 3385 ] IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY. THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION No: 5826 of 2026 Between: . 1 K. Srrnivas Reddy, S/o. K. Anantha Reddy, Aged 73 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. 1-'19, Thurkaguda, lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Kappapahad, Ranga Reddy Distrrct. 2 K. Narender Reddy, S/o. K. Srinivas Reddy, Aged 38 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o 1 -19, Thurkaguda, lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. 3. K-Jayender Reddy, S/o. K. Srinivas. Reddy, Aged 36 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o Plot No. 1, Subashnagar Colony, Kammaguda, Turkayamjal, Ragannaguda X Roads, Ranga Reddy District. ... Petitioners/Accused 2 to 4 AND 1 . The State of Telangana, Rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad. 2 G . Dhanalakshmi, D/o. Late G. Biksham, aged 38 years, Caste. Madiga (SC), R/o H. No. 41, Abhudyanagar, Road No. 3, Chintalkunta, Vanasthalipuram, Hyderabad. ...
Respondents Petition under Section 482 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the lvlemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to enlarge the petitroners/A2 to 44 on barl in the event of their arrest in connection with Cr. No 643 of 2O26 dated 0710412026 on the file of PS Vanasthalipuram, Malkaigiri District This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri N Krishna Sumanth, Advocate for the Petitioners and Sri M. Ramachandra Reddy, Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No. 1 and none appeared for the Respondent No. 2- The Court made the following: ORDER *€rai**r IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STA! E OF r-\ TELANGANA AT IIYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SMT. JIISTICE K. I|UJANA CRIMINAL PETITION No. 5826 of 1| t26 DATE: 21. O4. 2O26 Between: K' Srinivas R"ddv *d. :*talii... r", Accus*, t Nos.
2 to 4 AND The State of Telangarra, Represented pt by its blic Prosecutor, High Court of Tetangana, HyderzLl ,ad ald alother. .... F espondents ORDER: This Criminal Petition is hled under Se :tion 4g2 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2oil (for short 'BNSSJ by the petitioners/ accused Nos. 2 to I seeking to enlarge them on Anticipatory Bail in the r. ent of their arrest in Crime No. 643 of 2026 of Vanasthali, ruram police Station, Malkajgiri District registered for the alleged offences punishable under Secrions 316(2), 3 8(4), lt1(2), r/w 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (for sL. r rt. BNSJ and 3(l)(r)(s), s(2)(va) SC ST poA Acr. 2. Heard Sri N. Krishna Sumanth, lear ted counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners ts well as Sri M. Ramachandra Reddy, learned Addit onal public \ \- . fl z Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the respondent No. l State. 3. tearned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that the provision has been altered to Section 69 of the BNS.
However, he contended that the said provision is not applicable to the facts and circumstances of the present case, and therefore cannot be invoked against the petitioner.. 3. Without going into the merits of the case, since the punishment prescribed for the offences alleged against the petitioners are less than seven (O7) years, this Court deems it appropriate to direct the petitioners to appear before the Investigating Offrcer on or before O5. 05. 2026 between 11:00 a. m. and O5:0O p. m. and il turn, the Investigating Ofhcer is directed to follow the procedure laid down under Section 35 (3) of BNSS (previously Section 41-A of Cr. P. C. ) and also the guidelines formulated by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Arnesh Kumor u. State of Blhart scrupulously.
However, the petitioners shall submit their defense and co-operate with the Investigating Officer as and wtren required by furnishing information and produce all relevant documents/ material required for the purpose of the investigation and the Investigating Ofhcer shall consider the (2014) 8 SCC 273 a same before filing appropriate report befor: the learned Magistrate concerned. 4 Accordingly, the Criminal petition is disp ,sed of. Miscellaneous applications, if any pend:r g, shall atso stand closed. SD,. ( BHAVANI SWAMY ASI; STANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Vll Additional Metropolitan lrilagistrate, Cybera rad at Hayathnagar tr/andal, Ranga Reddy District 2 The Station House Offrcer, Vanasthalipuram Police Stat rn' Irilalkajgiri 3. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court for the S tate of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT] 4. One CC to Sri N Krishna Sumanth, Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CD Copies o At]K I I HIGH COURT DATED: 2110412026 I 7-:\ . ;1 1ur sra41 i -t "a \.
ORDER ,. ,/<\ ,}. i ('i. li i; CRLP. No. 5826 ol 2026 ' . rF . n_. I t) L {i|1 lulB : ',\^-- ,r ",1 . ) DISPOSING OF THE CRIMINAL PETITION g [[
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.