Skip to main content
LawSphereX

SMT. MEENA AGRAWAL v. D.P. SINGH

Court: High Court of Madhya Pradesh

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court of Madhya Pradesh judgment dated 2024-01-12. SMT. MEENA AGRAWAL v. D.P. SINGH. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.

Judgment text

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AVANINDRA KUMAR SINGH th ON THE 12 OF JANUARY, 2024 MISC. APPEAL No. 7833 of 2023 BETWEEN:- 1. SMT. MEENA AGRAWAL W/O LATE PRAMOD AGRAWAL, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, OCCUPATION: BUSINESS R/O KAWARRAM NEAR(KAILASH) TALKIES SATNA, POLICE STATION KOLGAWAN, TEHSIL RAGHURAJNAGAR, DISTRICT SATNA (MADHYA PRADESH) 2. RAJESH KUMAR AGRAWAL S/O LATE SHRI MAYA PRAKASH AGRAWAL, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, OCCUPATION: BUSINESS R/O KAWARRAM NEAR (KAILASH) TALKIES SATNA P. S. KOLGAWAN TAHSIL RAGHURAJNAGAR DISTRICT SATNA (MADHYA PRADESH) ..... PETITIONER (BY SHRI VINOD KUMAR DUBEY - ADVOCATE FOR APPELLANTS) AND 1. D. P. SINGH S/O SHRI K. P. SINGH, AGED ABOUT 67 Y E A R S , OCCUPATION: BUSINESS R/O MUKHTIYARGANJ SATNA, TEHSIL RAGHURAJNAGAR, DISTRICT SATNA (MADHYA PRADESH) 2. MASURIYADEEN DUBEY W/O SHRI JAGDAMBA PRASAD DUBEY, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, OCCUPATION: BUSINESS R/O UTAILI SATNA TAHSIL RAGHURAJNAGAR DISTRICT SATNA (MADHYA PRADESH) 3.

VIJAY AGRAWAL S/O LATE SHRI BALIKISHAN DAS AGRAWAL, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, OCCUPATION: BUSINESS R/O REWA ROAD SATNA TAHSIL RAGHURAJNAGAR DISTRICT SATNA (MADHYA PRADESH) Signature Not Verified Signed by: VINAY KUMAR Signing time: 2/2/2024 12:34:38 PM 4. VISHAL AGRAWAL S/O LATE SHRI PRAMOD AGRAWAL, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, OCCUPATION: BUSINESS R/O KAWARRAM NEAR (KAILASH) TALKIES SATNA P. S. KOLGAWAN TAHSIL RAGHURAJNAGAR DISTRICT SATNA (MADHYA PRADESH) 5. MEGHA AGRAWAL D/O LATE SHRI PRAMOD AGRAWAL, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, OCCUPATION: BUSINESS R/O KAWARRAM NEAR (KAILASH) TALKIES SATNA P. S. KOLGAWAN TAHSIL RAGHURAJNAGAR DISTRICT SATNA (MADHYA PRADESH) 6. THE STATE OF M. P. THROUGH THE COLLECTOR SATNA DISTRICT SATNA (MADHYA PRADESH) ..... RESPONDENTS (BY SHRI P. N. MISHRA - ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NOS. 1 AND 2) (NONE FOR RESPONDENT NOS. 3 TO 5) (SHRI T. R.

KURMI - PANEL LAWYER FOR THE RESPONDENT/STATE) This appeal coming on for admission this day, th e court passed the following: ORDER Learned counsel for the appellants seeks to withdraw this Misc. Appeal with the liberty to raise all factual and legal issues before the learned trial Court. His only prayer is that let the trial Court decide this suit within a period of six months. The learned counsel for respondents have no objection, therefore, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with a request to the learned trial Court to make all endeavours to decide the civil suit within six months. (AVANINDRA KUMAR SINGH) JUDGE vkv /- Signature Not Verified Signed by: VINAY KUMAR Signing time: 2/2/2024 12:34:38 PM

Source: High Court of Madhya Pradesh. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.