FAIZAN AHMED v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND AND ANR
Court: High Court of Jharkhand
Bench: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Jharkhand judgment dated 2024-12-09. FAIZAN AHMED v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND AND ANR. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (C) No. 3280 of 2013 Faizan Ahmed son of Md. Sultan Ahmed, resident of House No. 1/38, Resaldar Nagar, Doranda, P. O. & P. S. - Doranda, District-Ranchi (Jharkhand). … … Petitioner Versus 1. State of Jharkhand and Ors. 2. The Chief Area Manager, Indian oil Corporation Limited, Indane Area nd Office, 2 Floor, Pulsar Plaza, Line Tank Road, P. O. - GPO(Ranchi), P. S. - Kotwali, District- Ranchi (Jharkhand). 3. The Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. Regional Office, Indian Oil Bhawan, th 7 Floor, Aliyawar Jung Mar, Bandra(E), Mumbai. 4. Sri Setu Shankar, son of Ravindra Mohar Tiwari, Vill-Gari, Booty Road, Near Khelgaon More, P. O. -Bariatu, P. S. Sadar, District: Ranchi (Jharkhand) … … Respondents --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Jalisur Rahman, Advocate (Joined Online) For the State : Mr. Rahul Dev, AC to SC (L&C)-III For the Resp. No. 2 : Mr. Rahul Lamba, Advocate : Mr.
Nilesh Modi, Advocate --- 05/09. 12. 2024 1. The learned counsel for the parties are present. 2. This petition has been filed for the following reliefs: “(i) For quashing the order dated- 17. 05. 2013 issued by the respondent No. 2, whereby and whereunder selection of the petitioner for LPG Distributorship has been cancelled on a wrong and false ground that Land is not in own name or members of family unit, when the fact is that land is his ancestral property. (ii) During the pendency of this writ application further proceeding for re-draw/re-lottery may be stay, which is going to be held on 11. 06. 2013 by the respondent No. 2. ” 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner has appeared online, seeks permission to withdraw this petition. 4. The learned counsel for the respondents has no objection to the prayer of withdrawal made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 5. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 6. Pending I. A, if any, is closed.
Rakesh/- (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J. )
Source: High Court of Jharkhand. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.