Shabad Srinivas Rao v. The State of Telangana
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2026-04-16. Shabad Srinivas Rao v. The State of Telangana. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
[ 32ss I IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N. V. SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO: 11557 OF 2026 Between: Shabad Srinivas Rao, S/o late Shabad Venkaiah, Aged about 71yrs, Occ Business, R/o H. No. 7-1-307l44l1lA, Balkampeta, B. K. Guda, S. R. Nagar, Hyderabad. ... PETITIONER AND 1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration and Urban Development Department, Secretariate, Hyderabad. 2. The Cyberabad Municipal Corporation, Rep. By its Commissioner, CC Complex, Lower Tank Band, Hyderabad. 3. The Zonal Commissioner, Kukatpally Zone, Cyberabad Municipal Corporation, Hyderabad. 4. The City Planner, Cyberabad Municipal Corporation, Hyderabad. ...
RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that: in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the,nature of Writ of Mandamus, dectaring the action of the respondents in issuing the Shortfall lntimation Letter vide File No. 016826/CMC/O0508/SWBPlKPL2l2O26 dated 09. 04. 2026, in respect of the petitioners property to an extent of 424. 71 Sq. Mt in Plot No. 30A & 32 B situated in Survey Nos. 41112 & 41113, Khanamet Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, as illegal, arbitrary, unreasonable and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of lndia and consequently set aside the said Shortfall lntimation Letter and direct the respondents to forthwith consider and grant building permission to the petitioners for construction of residential building in accordance with taw, without insisting upon arbitrary and untenable objections.
''i-': ' jrlii:t-. ,. r r' ' ,ini*lfrjiYit;i iw. &+J4".... l. A. NO: 1OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed irr support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operatic,n of the Shortfall lntimation Letter vide File No. 016826/CMC/(10508/SWBP/KPL2| 2026 dated 09. 04. 2026, and consequently direct the respondents to receive, process and consider the building permission application of the petition€rr in respect of Plot Nos. 30A & 32B, situated in Survey Nos. 41112 & 41113, Khanarnet Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, without reference to the impugned, shortfall objections,, pending disposal of the Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SIVA PRASAD ALLAPARTHI Counsel for thre Respondent No. l: GP FOR MUNIGIPAL ADMINISTRATION & URBAN DEVELOPMENT Counsel for the Respondent No.
2 to 4: SRI GUDI MADHUSUDHAN REDDY, SC FOR GHMC The Court made the following: ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI KUMAR IUSTICE N. V. SHRAVAN WRIT PETITION No. 11557 of 2025 DATE OF ORDER: 16. 04. 2026 Between: Shabad Srinivas Rao. ... Petitioner AND The State of Telangana, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration and Urban Development Department and others. \ .. Respondents ORDER: Heard Sri Siva Prasad Allaparthi, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for MA&UD appearing for respondent No. L and Sri Gudi Madhusudhan Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for GHMC appearing for respondent Nos. 2 to 4. t I 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this writ petition is filed seeking to declare the action of the respondents in issuing shortfall initiation letter aidc File No. 016826 / CIlv{C/ 00508/SWBP / l<PLz/ 2A26 dated 09. 44. 2026 in respect of the petitioner's property to an extent of 424.
71. Sq. meters in Plot No. 30A and 328 in Survey Nos. 41/12 and 41,/13 of Khanamet village, Serilingampally Mandal, Rangareddy District, as illegal and arbitrary. 3. After arguing for a considerable length of time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would file a detailed explanation to the shortfall intimation letter dated 09. 04. 2026 - 4. Ilecording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitior. er, this Writ Petition is disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to If the file an explanation to the shortfall intimation letter dated 09. 04. 2026. petitior. er is otherwise aggrieved, the petitioner may seek appropriate remedy as available under [aw. lvliscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. No order ar; to costs. SD/. A. H. S GOWRI SHANKAR / REGISTRAR / //TRUE COPY// CTION OFFICER To, 1.
The Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration and Urban Development Departrrent, The State of Telangana, Secretariate, Hyderabad. 2. The Commissioner, The Cyberabad Municipal Corporation, CC Complex, Lower'l-ank Band, Hyderabad ',Zonal 3. The Commissioner, Kukatpally Zone, Cyberabad Municipal Corporation, Hyderabad. 4. The City Planner, Cyberabad Municipal Corporation, Hyderabad. 5. One CC to SRI SIVA PRASAD ALLAPARTHI, Advocate [OPUC] 6. One CC to SRI GUDI MADHUSUDHAN REDDY, SC FOR GHMC [OPUC] (lCs 7. Two to GP FOR MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION & URBAN DEVEL. OPMENT, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad IOUTI 8. Two CD Copies BN R{r , , HIGH COURT DATEDi 1610412026 'ii;r. iii ORDER 1\1\ \\\ o 1$ o * WP. No. 1'1557 of 2026 d * DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS COQ\D \i g't'
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.