Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan v. Bharatiya Vidya Bhavans Staffs Employees Union of AP
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: G.RADHA RANI
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2024-01-11. Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan v. Bharatiya Vidya Bhavans Staffs Employees Union of AP. Read the...
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE G. RADHA RANI SECOND APP EAL NO: 872OF 2O1o second Appeal under Section 100 of c. p. c against the Judgment and Decree dated 25. 06. 2010 made in A. S. No. 4Bt ot 2oos on the file Additional Chief Judge, city Civil Court, Hyderabad. Between: Bharatiya vidya Bhavan, Hyderabad Kendra rep by its Hyderabad. AND 1. Bharatiya Vidya Bhavans Staff Employees Union of Ap, by its ceneral Secretary O/o. King Koti, Hyderabad. 2. M. lr/ukesh President, Bharatiya Vidya Bhavans Staffs & AP King Koti, Hyderabad. 3. B. R. Jithender Working President, Bharatiya Vidya Employees Union of AP Regd No. 1093, King Koti, Hyderabad. l. A. NO: 1 OF 2O10(SAMP. NO: 1 962 0F 20.
t0) Petition under Order XXXIX Rule 1 & 2 R/w Section in the circumstances steted in the affidavit filed in support court may be pleased to grant temporary injunction restraining and 3 from picketing demonstrating, gheroaing, or preventing egress of the petitioner's vehicles, staff, teachers, students, visitors from entering into the petitioner's premises demonslrations, slogans, shouting within a distance of 500 of the petitioner's premises. Counsel for the Appellant(s):SRl. VTVEK JAtN Counsel forthe Respondent No. 3: Sri N HARI PRASAD The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE G. RADHA RANI SECOND APPEA LNo . 872 of 2010 JUDGMENT: Leamed counsel for the appellant reported that the respondent No'l - Bharatiya Vidya Bhavans Staff Employees Union is not functionirrg at present. As such, the cause of action would not survive and sought permission of this Court for withdrawal of the Second Appeal with a liberty to file as and when necessary. 2.
Permission is accorded as prayed for. 3. Accor. dingly, the Second Appeal is dismissed as withdraw. n granting a libcrty to the appetlant to agitale the mattcr as and when required' I'lo order as to costs As a sequel, tniscellaneous applications pending in this appeal if any, shall stand closed SD/- CH. VENKATESW LU DEPUW REGIS RAR \ //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Xl Additional Chief Judge, city Civil Court, Hyderabad (with records) 2. One CC to SRl. VIVEK JAIN Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to SRl. N HARI PRASAD Advocate [OPUC] 4. Two CD Copies SP/JK w HIGH COURT j DATED:1 110112024 JUDGMENT SA. No. 872 of 2010 1HE SI4 e (o 1( J G ,:) 0 4 itAR 2024 o * * D gg PTlTCH SECOND APPEAL IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN rcpf.. l 6 w ;[J'4
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.