KAMLESH KUMARI v. STATE OF HP AND OTHERS
Court: High Court of Himachal Pradesh
Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE L. NARAYANA SWAMY,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Himachal Pradesh judgment dated 2020-12-24. KAMLESH KUMARI v. STATE OF HP AND OTHERS. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 2691 of 2020. Date of Decision : December 24, 2020. Kamlesh Kumari ... Petitioner. Versus State of H. P. & Others ... Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice L. Narayana Swamy, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Anoop Chitkara, Judge. 1 Whether approved for reporting? No. For the petitioner : Mr. Rajiv Rai, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Ashok Sharma, A. G. with Ms. Rita Goswami & Mr. Adarsh Sharma, Addl. A. Gs. , for respondents No. 1 & 2. COURT PROCEEDINGS CONVENED THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE Anoop Chitkara, Judge (oral). The petitioner, who is working as Trained Graduate Teacher (Non Medical) in Government Senior Secondary School, Malyawar, District Bilaspur, H. P. , and is under transfer to Government Senior Secondary School, Paura Kothi, District Mandi, H. P. , has come up before this Court seeking cancellation of the impugned order of transfer dated 20. 07. 2020, Annexure P-1. 2. Notice. Mr.
Adarsh Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General appears and accepts service of notice on behalf of respondents No. 1 and 2. Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? In view of the nature of the order, we propose to pass, no response is required from the respondents. Consequently, this petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to make representation to the first respondent, within a in accordance with the transfer policy, on medical grounds taken by her in paragraph 6 of the petition, which read as follows: “…. the father-in-law of the petitioner of age approximately 70 years is also suffering from prostate cancer and is under treatment from Chandigarh and there is none in the family of the petitioner to look after him as the brother of the petitioner is also employed at Food Corporation of India outside the State of Himachal Pradesh.
” On receipt of such representation, the concerned respondent shall decide the same, in the light of the transfer policy occupying the field, within one week. Subject to filing of representation within the time-frame mentioned above, interim order dated 04. 08. 2020 is extended till the disposal of the representation. Pending application(s), if any, are closed. Copy Dasti. (L. Narayana Swamy) Chief Justice. (Anoop Chitkara), Judge December 24, 2020 (ps/Himani)
Source: High Court of Himachal Pradesh. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.