M/s. Veenus Enterprises, a Partnership firm having v. Ramani Vara Prasad
Court: High Court of Andhra Pradesh
Bench: RAVI NATH TILHARI,MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Andhra Pradesh judgment dated 2025-03-18. M/s. Veenus Enterprises, a Partnership firm having v. Ramani Vara Prasad. Read the judgment and case...
Judgment text
V- IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI TUESDAY ,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT >■ s THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM APPEAL SUIT NO: 359 OF 2014 Appeal under Section 96 of C. P. C, against the Decree & Judgment dated the Decree and Judgment dated 10. 06. 2014 in OS. No. 195/2007 passed by the in the court of XIII Additional District and Sessions Judge, Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam District Between: 1. M/s. Veenus Enterprises, a Partnership firm having, its Business at B-Block, Plot NO. B-5, Autonagar, A. P. I. E. Area, Mind Village Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam rep. by Kodamarti Sreenivas, S/o. Suryanarayana, Hindu, aged about 36 years, residing at H. No. HIG- 26, Sheelanagar, Visakhapatnam. 2. Kodamarti Subba Lakshmi, W/o. Suryanarayana, Hindu, aged about 68 years. Partner of the 1®‘ plaintiff firm. Residing at H. No. HIG-26, Sheelanagar, Visakhapatnam. 3.
Kodamarti Suryanarayana, S/o. K. V. Subrahmanyam, Hindu, aged about 75 years. Partner of the 1®‘ plaintiff firm, residing at H. No. HIG-26, Sheelanagar, Visakhapatnam. 4. Smt. Nadiminti Yashoda, W/o. Late Sanyasi Rao, Hindu, aged about 53 years,Partner of the 1st plaintiff firm, residing at H. No. HIG-26, Sheelanagar, Visakhapatnam. 5. Kodamarti Udai Bhaskar. S/o. Suryanarayana Hindu, aged about 40 years,Partner of the 1st plaintiff firm, residing at H. No. HIG-26, Sheelanagar, Visakhapatnam. 6. Kodamarti Srenivas S/o. Suryanarayana, Hindu aged about 36 -y years,Partner of the 1st plaintiff firm residing at H. No. HIG-26 Sheelanagar, Visakhapatnam. ... Appellants/Defendants 1 to 6 AND 1. Ramani Vara Prasad, S/o. Venkayya, Hindu, Occ; Business, D. No. 27-3- 53, Srinagar, Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam. 2. The Sub Registrar, Gajuwaka, [ having Office at Auto Nagar Chattivanipalem, Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam. ... Respondents LA. NO: 1 OF 2014rASMP.
NO: 1341 OF Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of Decree and Judgment dated 10. 06. 2014 in OS. No. 195/2007 passed by the court of XIII Additional District and Sessions Judge, Gajuwaka Visakhapatnam District pending the above appeal Counsel for the Appellant: Smt Deepika Gadde - no representation Counsel for the Respondent No. 1 ; Sri G Rama Gopal The Court made the following; APHC010472872014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3524] (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM APPEAL SUIT NO: 359/2014 Between: M/s. Veenus Enterprises, A Partnership Firm Having and ... APPELLANT(S) Others AND Ramani Vara Prasad and Others ... RESPONDENT{S) Counsel for the Appellant(S): 1.
DEEPIKAGADDE Counsel for the Respondent{S): 1. G RAMA GOPAL The Court made the following: 9^ THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM APPEAL SUIT NO: 359/2014 JUDGMENT: (per Ravi Nath Tilhari, J) On 07. 01. 2025, the following order was passed; “At the request made on behalf of learned counsel for the appellant, list the appeal on 04. 02. 2025. ” 2. On 18. 02. 2025, the following order was passed: “At the request made on behalf of learned counsel for the appellants, list the matter on 04. 03. 2025 for filing paper books. ” 3. On 04. 03. 2025, the following order was passed: “Request has been made by Sri Y. Sitharam, learned counsel representing the appellant’s counsel, for adjournment, to enable him to file paper books. 2. Post on 18. 03. 2025. ” 4. Today also there is no representation for the appellants. 5. Sri G. Rama Gopal, learned counsel appears for respondents through virtual mode. 6. The matter pertains to the year 2014. 7.
In view of the above, the Appeal Suit is dismissed for “want of prosecution”. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed. Sd/- K TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The XIII Additional District and Sessions Judge, Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam District (with records if any) 2. One CC to Smt. Deepika Gadde, Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to Sri. G Rama Gopal, Advocate [OPUC] Pradesh at 4. The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court of Andhra Amaravathi 5. Three CD Copies Stu sree 4IlP HIGH COURT DATED:18/03/2025 JUDGMENT AS. No. 359 of 2014 f 0^ APR 2025 Current Section DISMISSING THE APPEAL SUIT FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS
Source: High Court of Andhra Pradesh. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.