M. RAVINDRAN NAIR v. STATE OF KERALA
Court: High Court of Kerala
Bench: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.M.MANOJ
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Kerala judgment dated 2026-06-01. M. RAVINDRAN NAIR v. STATE OF KERALA. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL THURSDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 27TH PHALGUNA, 1942 WP(C). No. 40720 OF 2017(L) PETITIONER/S: M. RAVINDRAN NAIR (RETIRED SECTION OFFICER (F. C &D),UNIVERSITY OF KERALA, "ROHINI", MACHEL. P. O. ,MALAYINKAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADVS. SRI. P. SANTHOSH KUMAR (PANAMPALLI NAGAR) SRI. V. ANANDA SHENOY SRI. K. P. CHANDRASEKHAR SRI. LUIZ GODWIN D COUTH RESPONDENT/S: 1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY,HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT,GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001. 2 UNIVERSITY OF KERALA THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,REPRESENTED BY THE REGISTRAR- 695 001 3 THE REGISTRAR UNIVERSITY OF KERALA,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695 001 4 K. MOHANDAS (ENQUIRY OFFICER) JOINT REGISTRAR (FINANCE), UNIVERSITY OF KERALA,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695 001. R1-2 BY SRI. THOMAS ABRAHAM, SC, UNIVERSITY OF KERALA OTHER PRESENT: GP SRI B HARISH KUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 18. 03.
2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C). No. 40720 OF 2017(L) JUDGMENT th Dated this the 18 day of March 2021 There is no appearance for the petitioner. Therefore, I have no reason to think that the petitioner is interested in prosecuting the writ petition. The writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution. SD/- AMIT RAWAL sab JUDGE WP(C). No. 40720 OF 2017(L) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 9. 11. 1998 FROM THE 3RD RESPONDENT TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY LETTER DATED 17. 11. 1998 FROM THE PETITIONER TRUE COPY OF THE MEMO DATED 26. 11. 1998 FROM THE 3RD RESPONDENT TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY TO THE MEMO DATED 3. 12. 1998 FROM THE PETITIONER TRUE COPY OF THE NON LIABILITY CERTIFICATE DATED 5. 12. 1998 TRUE COPY OF THE PENSION SANCTIONING ORDER DATED 15. 3. 1999 OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT TRUE COPY OF THE REVISED PENSION SANCTIONING ORDER DTAED 7. 9. 1999 PURSUANT TO PAY REVISION TRUE COPY OF THE MEMO DATED 8. 12.
1999 TRUE COPY OF THE ALLEGED CHARGES DATED 8. 12. 1999 TRUE COPY OF THE MEMO DATED 7. 4. 2000 FIXING THE LIABILITY TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 22. 11. 2004 OF THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT IN OP NO. 18911/2000 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 7. 7. 2009 IN WRIT APPEAL NO. 1329/2005 TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTION DATED 13. 8. 2009 SUBMITTED TO THE 3RD RESOPNDENT TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 6. 3. 2010 FROM THE 3RD RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P15 TRUE COPY OF THE REVIEW PETITION DATED WP(C). No. 40720 OF 2017(L) 15. 3. 2010 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P16 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 7. 6. 2010 FROM THE 3RD RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P17 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 4. 3. 2015 FROM THE PETITIONER EXHIBIT P18 TRUE COPY OF THE ARGUMENT NOTE FILED FROM THE 3RD RESOPNDENT EXHIBIT P19 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTE OF SUCCESSOR OFFICER TO THE HIGHER AUTHORITY EXHIBIT P20 TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDING DATED 7. 8. 2017 FROM THE PETITIONER.
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.