EMAJUDDIN SHEIKH v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.
Court: Calcutta High Court
Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE BIVAS PATTANAYAK
Judgment date:
Case summary
Calcutta High Court judgment dated 2025-12-03. EMAJUDDIN SHEIKH v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE WPA 16472 of 2025 Emajuddin Sheikh vs. State of West Bengal & ors. Md. Yusuf Ali … for the petitioner Mr. Bhaskar Prasad Vaisya Mr. Gourav Das … for the State 1. Affidavit of service filed on behalf of the petitioner is taken on record. 2. By the present writ petition, the petitioner seeks for direction upon respondent no. 3, the District Inspector of Schools (S. E. ), Malda to recalculate the retiral dues including the pensionary benefits of the petitioner by taking into account the 3% additional increment for performing additional responsibilities as Headmaster of the Institution viz. the Higher Secondary Madrasah st st from 1 July, 2010 to 31 May, 2020. 3. The petitioner contends that he joined as an Assistant Teacher in Uttar Lakshmipur High School. In the year 1987, the said school was upgraded from Junior High School to High School, however, the service of the petitioner was not approved.
The approval of the service of the petitioner was granted by the order of this Court. On completion of the M. Sc. (Zoology), the petitioner was granted post graduate scale of pay. Subsequent thereto the petitioner was appointed as the Headmaster of Ideal High Madrasah. The st petitioner retired from service on 31 May, 2020 on superannuation. The pension was not granted in favour of the petitioner on the ground of overdrawn amount. The petitioner was directed to refund the sum of Rs. 1,76,812/- as an overdrawn amount. Accordingly, the petitioner deposited the said amount with the concerned Department and consequently the pension was granted. 4.
The petitioner filed a writ petition being WPA 19271 of 2023 seeking for refund of the overdrawn amount th which was allowed by this Court on 25 August, 2023 as follows: “Accordingly, the concerned Director of Pension, Provident Fund and Group Insurance, Government of West Bengal and also the concerned Treasury Officer are directed to release the said amount of Rs. 1,76,812/- along with interest @8% per annum thereon in favour of the petitioner from the date of issuance of PPO till the date of payment, such payment is to be made within a period of eight weeks from the date of communication of this order. ” 5. The petitioner thereafter made an application for re-st fixation of his pay with effect from 1 July, 2010 to st 31 May, 2020 before respondent no. 3, the District Inspector of Schools (S. E. ), Malda including the other th authorities on 12 June, 2025. The same is still pending with the authority. Hence this writ petition. 6. Md.
Yusuf Ali, learned advocate appearing for the petitioner seeks that the matter be relegated to respondent no. 3, the District Inspector of Schools (S. E. ), Malda for consideration and disposal of the th application of the petitioner dated 12 June, 2025. 7. Mr. Bhaskar Prasad Vaisya, learned advocate representing the State leaves the matter to the discretion of the Court. 8. Accordingly, respondent no. 3, the District Inspector of Schools (S. E. ), Malda is directed to consider and th dispose of the application of the petitioner dated 12 June, 2025 within a period of six weeks from date of communication of this order upon giving notice to the petitioner as well as to the Madrasah authority, respondent nos. 6 and 7 herein. 9. Learned advocate for the petitioner is directed to communicate this order to respondent no. 3, the District Inspector of Schools (S. E. ), Malda, for necessary compliance. 10. With the above observations, WPA 16472 of 2025 stands disposed of. 11.
Since no affidavits have been called for, the allegations made in the writ petition are deemed to be not admitted. 12. Consequently, connected applications, if any, also stand disposed of. 13. Interim orders, if any, stand vacated. 14. There will be no order as to costs. 15. Urgent certified photostat copy of this order, if applied for, shall be given to the parties as expeditiously as possible on compliance of all necessary formalities. (Bivas Pattanayak, J. )
Source: Calcutta High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.