Pathlvath Kousalya Lavudya Kousalya v. The State of Telangana
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: TIRUMALA DEVI EADA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2026-01-23. Pathlvath Kousalya Lavudya Kousalya v. The State of Telangana. Read the judgment and case...
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 717 OF 2026 Betwee n: 1. Pathlvath Kousalya @ Lavudya Kousalya, Wo. Vinod Kumar, age 26 years, Occ. Housewrfe, R/o H No 3 79, Vailagadda Thanda, H/o. Pedda Adhirala Village, Jadcherla l\rlandal, N4ahabubnagar District 2. Pathlvath Srinu, S/o. Bhojya. age 32 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. H. No. 3-81, Varla Gadda Thanda, H/o. Pedda Adirala Village, Jadcharla lvlandal, IVlahabubnagar Distnct. 3. Jatavath Saritha, Wo Ravi, age 35 years, Occ. Housewife, R/o. H. No. 14-26, K. C. Kunta Thanda, lVlaheshwaam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. 4. Pathlvath Bharathi, Wo. Pathlavath Bojya, Age 50 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. H. No. 3-79, Varlgadda Thanda, Pedda Adirala Village, Jadcherla lvlandal, Mahabubnagar District. .... PETITIONERS/A,I TO 44 AND "l . The State of Telangana, rep.
by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Telangana at Hyderabad, (Jadcherla PS, Itrlahabubnagar Dtstrict). 2. Kum. Lavudya Vennela, D/o. Hari Singh, aged about 20 years, Occ. Student, R/o. Road No 2, Ashok Nagar Colony, Jadcherla Village and Mandal, ..... RESPONDENTS/DEFACTO COMPLAINANT Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in C. C. No. 658 of 2023 on the file of the Additional Judicial First Class Magstrate at Jadcherla of fvlahabubnagar District. l. A. NO: 1OF 2026 Petition under Sectron 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the lt/lemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in C. C. No.
658 of 2023 on the file of the Additronal Judicial Frrst Class l\/agistrate at Jadcherla of tt4ahabubnagar District by dispensing the appearance of the petitione rs/accu sed 1 to 4, pending disposal of Quash petition This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusirg l-re l,4emorandum of Grounds of Crintinal Petrtion and upon hearing the arg r 'ents of Sri A SAI CHAKRAVARTHY Advocate for the Petitioners and r- : Additional Pu b lic; ProsecLrtor (TG/AP) on behalf of the Respondent No. 1 an,l r None Appeared for the Responden t No 2 The Court made the following: ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA CRIMINAL PETITION No. 717 of 2026 Date: 23. 01. 2026 Betvveen: Pathlvath Kousalya Lavudya Kousalya and three others @ ... Petitioners/accused Nos. 1 to 4 AND The State of Telangana, Represented by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Telangana at Hyderabad, (Jadcherla Police Station, Mahabubnagar District) and another. ...
Respondents ORDER This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 seeking to quash the proceedings against the petitioners/accused Nos. 1 to 4 in C. C. No. 658 of 2023, pending on the file of the learned Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate at Jadcherla, Mahabubnagar District, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 452,354,341 , 324,326, 504,506 riw. 34 of The lndian Penal Code, 1860 (for short 'lPC'). \ \ . , ii Crlp 1l ," 2026 2. Heard Sri A. Sai Chakravarthi, learned c ) rnsel for the petitioners/accused Nos. 1 to 4 as well as Sri . thender Rao Veeramalla, the learned Additional Public Prosecutc r appearing for the respondent No. 1 -State 3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, leanr ,rl counsel for the petitioners has limited his arguments seeking r direction to dispense with the appearance of the petitioners t r the Trial ',rre Cou rt 4.
The learned Additional Public Prosecutor : rbmitted that appropriate orders may be passed 5. Perused the record. The allegations level : i against the petitioners/accused Nos. 1 to 4 pertain to the offenc rs punishable under Sections 452, 354, 341 , 324,326,504,506 r,fl 34 of IPC C. C. No. 658 ot 2023 is pending on the file c,1 the learned Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate Jadcherla, Mahabubnagar District 6. Considering the submission of the learned o unsel for the petitioners, the Criminal Petition is disposed of dispe rsing with the presence of the petitioners/accused Nos. 1 to 4 beforrr he Trial Court provided that the petitioners are represented througl an Advocate Crlp ll1 2026 on every date of hearing and that they shall be present before the Trial Court whenever they are specifically required during the course of trial. 7 Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. SD/- M.
NAGAMANI A SISTANT REGISTRAR \ //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1 The Additionar Judiciar First crass lriragrstrate at Jadcherra of I\,4ahabubnagar , House Officer, Jadcherta police Srarion Jadcherta , Ir/ahabubnagar ;[:r:. 1r,,"" 3 One CC to SRt. A SAt CHAKRAVARTHy Advocate [OpUC] 4. Two CCs to public prosecutor, High Court i", in" Stit" of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT] 5. Two CD Copies d PSL I HIGH COURT DATED:2310112026 ;rE s 14 ( o I. c (i C) l-o i' l,l:l\ ORDER CRLP. No. 717 of 2O26 ,t * o i: '17611 DISPOSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION OL EL Y)
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.