GYANIDAS v. SMT. URMILA BAI
Court: High Court of Madhya Pradesh
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Madhya Pradesh judgment dated 2024-01-23. GYANIDAS v. SMT. URMILA BAI. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMAR NATH (KESHARWANI) rd ON THE 23 OF JANUARY, 2024 SECOND APPEAL No. 1942 of 2022 BETWEEN:- 1. GYANIDAS S/O LATE SHOBHADAS, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, OCCUPATION: AGRICULTURIST R/O VILLAGE MUNDI TAHSIL SHAHPURA DISTRICT DINDORI (MADHYA PRADESH) 2. SMT. PRAKASH BAI W/O LATE PUREDAS PANKA, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, OCCUPATION: HOUSEWIFE R/O VILLA MUNDI TEHSIL S H A H P U R A D I S T R I C T DINDORI (MADHYA PRADESH) 3. MANOJDAS S/O LATE PYAREDAS PANKA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, OCCUPATION: AGRICUTURE R/O VILLAGE MUNDITEHSIL SHAHPURA DISTRICT DINDORI (MADHYA PRADESH) 4. VINOD KUMAR S/O LATE PYAREDAS PANKA, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, OCCUPATION: AGRICULTURE R/O VILLAGE MUNDI TEHSIL SHAHPURA DISTRICT DINDORI (MADHYA PRADESH) 5. VIVEKDAS S/O PYREDAS PANKA, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, R/O VILLAGE MUNDI TEHSIL SHAHPURA DISTRICT DINDORI (MADHYA PRADESH) ..... APPELLANTS (NONE ) AND 1. SMT.
URMILA BAI W/O LATE KAPOORDAS PANKA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, VILLAGE RADHAKRISHNA WARD MANDLA TAHSIL AND 2. GAUTAM KUMAR S/O LATE KAPOORDAS PANKA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/O VILLAGE Signature Not Verified Signed by: SANTOSH Signing time: 25-Jan-24 11:47:04 AM RADHAKRISHNA WARD MANDLA TEHSIL AND 3. RAMDAS (DEAD) THROUGH THE LRS. GUDDADAS S/O RAMDAS PANIKA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/O VILLAGE PALTARA TAHSIL NARAYANGANJ, DISTRICT MANDLA (MADHYA PRADESH) 4. LALITDAS S/O RAMDAS PANIKA, AGED ABOUT 40 Y E A R S , R/O VILLAGE PALTARA TAHSIL NARAYANGANJ, DISTRICT MANDLA (MADHYA PRADESH) 5. FAGNI BAI D/O RAMDAS PANIKA, AGED ABOUT 32 Y E A R S , R/O VILLAGE PALTARA TAHSIL NARAYANGANJ, DISTRICT MANDLA (MADHYA PRADESH) 6. SUNIL S/O LATE SHIVDAS PANKA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/O VILLAGE PALTARA TAHSIL NARAYANGANJ, DISTRICT MANDLA (MADHYA PRADESH) 7. TIKARAM S/O LATE SHIVDAS PANKA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/O VILLAGE SALIWADA GAUR TAHSIL AND DISTRICT JABALPUR (MADHYA PRADESH) 8. SMT.
PRITIF W/O KRISHNA KUMAR PANKA, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, R/O CIVIL LINES MANDLA DISTRICT MANDLA (MADHYA PRADESH) 9. SMT. SUNIJTA W/O VISHANDAS PANKA, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, R/O CIVIL LINES MANDLA DISTRICT MANDLA (MADHYA PRADESH) 10. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH THE COLLECTOR MANDLA DISTRICT MANDLA (MADHYA PRADESH) 11. SMT. PUSHPA BAI D/O LATE PYAREDAS PANKA, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, R/O VILLAGE PADMI TAHSIL NARAYANGANJ DISTRICT MANDLA (MADHYA PRADESH) 12. GYARSI BAI D/O SHOBHADAS PANKA, AGED TAHSIL AND DISTRICT JABALPUR (MADHYA PRADESH) Signature Not Verified Signed by: SANTOSH Signing time: 25-Jan-24 11:47:04 AM 13. VIMLA BAI D/O SHOBHADAS PANKA, AGED TAHSIL AND DISTRICT JABALPUR (MADHYA PRADESH) 14. KAMLA BAI D/O SHOBHADAS PANKA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O GANGASAGAR JABALPUR TAHSIL AND DISTRICT JABALPUR (MADHYA PRADESH) 15. GUDDI BAI @ PUSHPA BAI D/O SHOBHADAS PANKA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O GANGASAGAR JABALPUR TAHSIL AND DISTRICT JABALPUR (MADHYA PRADESH) 16.
SAREDRA BAI D/O SHOBHADAS PANKA, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/O VILLAGE BAHUR PAYLI TAHSIL NIWAS DISTRICT MANDLA (MADHYA PRADESH) ..... RESPONDENTS (SHRI SHESHMANI MISHRA - PANEL LAWYER FOR RESPONDENT NO. 8/STATE) This appeal coming on for admission this day, th e court passed the following: ORDER No one is present for the appellants, even in the second round On previous date i. e. on 06/04/2023 also non appeared on behalf of appellants, which shows that the appellants have lost their interest in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Record of the trial Court as well as First Appellate Court be sent back to the concerned Court alongwith copy of this order. (AMAR NATH (KESHARWANI)) JUDGE skt Signature Not Verified Signed by: SANTOSH Signing time: 25-Jan-24 11:47:04 AM
Source: High Court of Madhya Pradesh. Archive: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.