M. Krishnamachary v. The Tahsildar,
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: K. SARATH
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2024-01-09. M. Krishnamachary v. The Tahsildar,. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
[ 3302 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH WRIT PETITION NO: 7775 OF 2009 Between: 1. [trl. Krishnamachary, S/o. Ramanujachary, 49 years, Officer, Bank of Baroda, lt/umbai, Permanent Address 3-7-32, Road No. 2, Sri Sainagar Colony, lVlansoorabad, L. B. Nagar, Hyderabad-500 068. 2. K. Lakshmi, Wo. K. G. Narasimha Chary, 53 years, 3-7-32, Road No. 2, Sri Sainagar Colony, lrllansoorabad, L. B. Nagar, Hyderabad-500 068. 3. M. Sesha Phani, D/o- M. V. Ramanujacharya,3T years,3-7-32, Road No. 2, Sri Sainagar Colony, [r/ansoorabad, L. B. Nagar, Hyderabad-SOO 068. ... PETITIONERS AND 1. The Tahsildar, Hanumakonda [Vlandal, Hanumakonda, Warangal District. 2. The Land Acquisition Officer & Assistant Collector, Warangal District, Warangal. 3 The District Collector, Warangal District, Warangal. ...
RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order direction or a writ one in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not paying the compensation in pursuance of the acquisition of the properties of the petitioner under Award Enquiry Notice bearing Rc. No. A/1661/86 dt. 21. 03. 1987 of the 2nd respondent, as illegal and arbitrary and consequently (i) direct the respondents to pay the compensalion to the petitioners forthwith along with interest at 18Yo per annum from the actual date on which the petitioners have been entitled to (ii) giving liberty to the petitioners to approach appropriate forum for making claim as to enhancement of the compensation, in the context of the case, if neceQsary. ,? i. {t l. A. NO: 1 OF 2009 (WPM P.
NO: 10190 OF 2009) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to pay compensation to the petitioners, in pursuance of the acquisition of the properties of the petitioner under Award Enquiry Notice bearing Rc. No. A/166'l /86 dt. 21. 03. 1987 of the 2nd respondent. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI A. SRINIVASA SARMA (NOT PRESENT) Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION The Court made the following: ORDER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH WRIT PETITION No. 7775 of 2OO9 ORDER: This petition is coming for hearing since 2OO9. On 24. LL. 2O23 and 19. 12. 2023 when the matter was called, there was no representation, and therefore the matter was ufor directed to be listed today under the caption Dismissal". Even today, when the matter is called, there is no representation.
It seems that the petitioners are not interested to prosecute this case. 2. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution/default. No order as to costs. 3. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed SD/- L. SIVA PARVATHI ASSISTANT BEGISTRAR \ \ ,// //TRUE COPY// \ s/ SECTION OFFICER To, 1. One CC to SRI A. SRINIVASA SARMA, Advocate [OPUCI 2. Two CCs to GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT] 3. Two CD Copies BSR GJP HIGH COURT DATED: 0910112024 ! ST AT ,6e E 1 4 o 2m ttB o 1? o + c t orspel! $ ORDER WP. No. 7775 ot 2009 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NON-PROSECUTION/DE FAU LT, WITHOUT COSTS 1D)].!
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.