SMTI. YIZANO v. SHRI J. ALAM, IAS AND 8 ORS
Court: Gauhati High Court
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI
Judgment date:
Case summary
Gauhati High Court judgment dated 2024-11-14. SMTI. YIZANO v. SHRI J. ALAM, IAS AND 8 ORS. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
Page No. # 1/3 GAHC020002482024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) KOHIMA BENCH Case No. : COP(C)/7/2024 SMTI. YIZANO OFFICE PEON, OFFICE OF THE EXTRA ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, AQHUNAQA, NUILAND NAGALAND VERSUS SHRI J. ALAM, IAS AND 8 ORS CHIUEF SECRETARY, NAGALAND, KOHIMA 2:SHRI ANOOP KHINCHI IAS COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF NAGALAND PERSONNEL AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS DEPARTMENT NAGALAND KOHIMA 3:SHRI VIKEYIE KENYA IAS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT NAGALAND KOHIMA 4:SHRI SENTIYANGER IMCHEN IAS FINANCE COMMISSIONER NAGALAND KOHIMA 5:SHRI WONCHIO ODYUO NCS ADDL. SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF NAGALAND FINANCE DEPARTMENT NAGALAND Page No. # 2/3 KOHIMA. 6:SHRI SUSHIL KUMAR PATEL IAS COMMISSIONER NAGALAND KOHIMA 7:SMTI. SARAH S. JAMIR NCS DEPUTY COMMISSIONER NUILAND NAGALAND 8:SMTI.
IMLIJUNGLA LEMTUR NCS EXTRA ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER AQHUNAQA NAGALAND 9:SHRI PITOHO CHOPHY IAAS ACCOUNTANT GENERAL KOHIMA NAGALAN Advocate for the Petitioner : VIKHONO KISO, I. IMTI LONGCHAR,SUPONGWATI WALLING,R ATSULA KIPS,OBANGNENLA LONGCHAR Advocate for the Respondent : GOVT ADV NL, BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI ORDER Date : 14-11-2024 Heard Mr. Supongwati Walling, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. V. Suokhrie, learned Addl. A. G ap-pearing on behalf of the respondent Nos. 2 to 8, Mr. N. Angami, Page No. # 3/3 learned Government Advocate for the respondent No. 1 and Mr. N. Mozhui, learned counsel for the respondent No. 9.
By way of this application under section 11 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act,1971, read with with the Comtempt of Courts (Gauhati High Court) Rules 1977 read with Article 215 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner is seeking initiation of contempt against the respondents for alleged willful violation of this Court’s order dated 15. 11. 2023 passed in W. A. No. 4/2023. Today when the matter was called, it is submitted at the bar that the pending amount has already been cleared to the petitioner. Mr. Supongwati Walling, learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that he has received instruction from the petitioner that the petitioner has received the pending arrear amount in her account. That being so, nothing remains for adju-dication in the instant contempt petition. Accordingly, the contempt petition stands closed. Sd/- JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Source: Gauhati High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.