KIRAN THAPA v. UNION OF INDIA AND 4 ORS.
Court: High Court of Meghalaya
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE W. DIENGDOH,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. VAIDYANATHAN, CHIEF JUSTICE
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Meghalaya judgment dated 2024-07-29. KIRAN THAPA v. UNION OF INDIA AND 4 ORS. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
Serial No. 03 HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA Regular List AT SHILLONG MC (WA) No. 26 of 2024 Date of order: 29. 07. 2024 Shri Kiran Thapa ... Applicant - Versus - 1. Union of India Represented by the Secretary to the Government of India, Ministry of Defence, New Delhi. 2. The Defence Estate Officer, Guwahati Circle, Narangi Military Station, P. O. Satgaon, Old Army School Building, Guwahati – 781171, Assam. 3. Shillong Cantonment Board, Shillong, Represented by its Chief Executive Officer, 13, Pine Walk Area, Near Rhino Auditorium, Shillong – 793001, East Khasi Hills District, Meghalaya. 4. The Chief Executive Officer, Shillong Cantonment Board, 13, Pine Walk Area, Near Rhino Auditorium, Shillong – 793001, East Khasi Hills District, Meghalaya. ... Opp. Parties 5. The Additional Deputy Commissioner (Revenue), East Khasi Hills District, Meghalaya ... Proforma Opp. Party Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice S. Vaidyanathan, Chief Justice Hon’ble Mr. Justice W.
Diengdoh, Judge Appearance: For the Applicant : Mr. K. N. Choudhury, Sr. Adv. with Mr. S. Sen, Adv. For the Respondents : Dr. N. Mozika, DSGI with Ms. A. Padhan, Adv. [For R 1 & 2] Mr. S. P. Mahanta, Sr. Adv. with Mr. M. Lyngdoh, Adv. [For R 3 & 4] Mr. N. D. Chullai, AAG with Ms. R. Colney, GA [For R 5] This application has been filed to condone the delay of 13 days in preferring the appeal against the judgment and order dated 05. 06. 2024. Heard Mr. K. N. Choudhury, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. S. Sen, learned counsel for the applicant, Dr. N. Mozika, learned DSGI assisted by Ms. A. Pradhan, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 1 and 2, Mr. S. P. Mahanta, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. M. Lyngdoh, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 3 and 4 and Mr. N. D. Chullai, learned AAG assisted by Ms. R. Colney, learned GA appearing for the respondent No 5. The respondents have no objection for condoning the delay.
Being satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, MC (WA) No. 26 of 2024 is allowed and the delay of 13 days is condoned. Registry is directed to diarize the appeal, if it is otherwise in order. List the appeal for admission on 30. 07. 2024. (W. Diengdoh) (S. Vaidyanathan) Judge Chief Justice Signature Not Verified Page 3 of 3 Digitally signed by SYLVANA LIZ KHARBHIH Date: 2024. 07. 29 15:21:16 IST Powered by TCPDF (www. tcpdf. org)
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.