TARACHU FITHU v. THE STATE OF NAGALAND AND 7 ORS
Court: Gauhati High Court
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY
Judgment date:
Case summary
Gauhati High Court judgment dated 2024-04-08. TARACHU FITHU v. THE STATE OF NAGALAND AND 7 ORS. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
Page No. # 1/3 GAHC020001622024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) KOHIMA BENCH Case No. : I. A. (Civil)/46/2024 TARACHU FITHU S/O MESUSU FITHU JOINT DIRECTOR, DEPT. OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, GOVT. OF NAGALAND KOHIMA NAGALAND VERSUS THE STATE OF NAGALAND AND 7 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF NAGALAND 2:THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER KOHIMA NAGALAND 3:THE SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT KOHIMA NAGALAND 4:THE DIRECTOR URBAN DEVELOPMENT KOHIMA NAGALAND 5:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY WORKS AND HOUSING DEPARTMENT KOHIMA NAGALAND 6:THE CHIEF ENGINEER Page No. # 2/3 WORKS AND HOUSING DEPARTMENT KOHIMA NAGALAND 7:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY P AND AR DEPARTMENT KOHIMA NAGALAND 8:SMTI. TEMJENRENLA ASST. DIRECTOR DIRECTORATE OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT KOHIMA NAGALAN Advocate for the Petitioner : I. APOK PONGENER Advocate for the Respondent : GOVT ADV NL BEFORE HON’BLE MR.
JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY 08-04-2024 The present application is filed for correction of an typographical error at paragraph No. 21 of the judgment and order dated 08. 04. 2022 passed in WP(C) 71(K)/2010. In the paragraph No. 21 of the said judgment and order dated the following sentence at line No. 16 was written: “In any of the event, the petitioner cannot be treated as senior to the respondent No. 8. ” However, the said sentence ought to have been written as “in any of the event, the respondent No. 8 cannot be treated as Senor to the petitioner” inasmuch as a declaration was made in the said judgment and order to the effect that the petitioner is Senior to respondent No. 8. Page No. # 3/3 Accordingly, the present application stands allowed and it is provided that the line at paragraph No. 21 be read as “in any of the event, the respondent No. 8 cannot be treated as Senior to the petitioner”. IA stands disposed of. Sd/- JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Source: Gauhati High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.