SREERAJ v. STATE OF KERALA
Court: High Court of Kerala
Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C. JAYACHANDRAN
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Kerala judgment dated 2025-03-26. SREERAJ v. STATE OF KERALA. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
2025:KER:25963 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C. JAYACHANDRAN TH WEDNESDAY, THE 26 DAY OF MARCH 2025 / 5TH CHAITHRA, 1947 WP(C) NO. 15810 OF 2013 PETITIONER: 1 SREERAJ AGED 40 YEARS S/O. K. PRABHAKARAN PILLA, KUZHIMATHIKKADU, KUNDARA, KOLLAM. BY ADVS. SRI. S. RAJEEV SRI. K. K. DHEERENDRAKRISHNAN RESPONDENTS: 1 STATE OF KERALA REP. BY SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 695 001. 2 DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE LAW ORDER POLICE HEADQUARTERS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 695 001. 3 SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE RURAL OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KOLLAM. 691 001. 4 CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE EZHUKONE POLICE STATION, KOLLAM DISTRICT-691 505. 5 SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE EZHUKON POLICE STATION, KOLLAM DISTRICT. 691 505. 6 O. MINIMOL, AGED 33 YEARS SREESAILAM, BHUTANI MUKKU, CHANDANATHOPPU P. O, KERALAPURAM, KOLLAM 691 014. W. P. (C. ) No. 15810 of 2013 2025:KER:25963 - 2 - ADDL. R6 IS IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 15-11-2013 IN I. A NO.
14628/2013. BY ADVS. SRI. E. C. BINEESH, GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. SHAJIN S. HAMEED THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26. 03. 2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W. P. (C. ) No. 15810 of 2013 2025:KER:25963 - 3 - C. JAYACHANDRAN, J. ------------------------------------ W. P. (C. ) No. 15810 of 2013 ------------------------------------th Dated, this the 26 day of March, 2025 JUDGMENT The petitioner seeks a mandamus to be issued directing the th 5 respondent to register the crime on the facts narrated in the Writ Petition. 2. Today, when the matter was taken up for consideration, learned Counsel for the petitioner would submit that he has no instructions as to the present state of affairs, especially whether the crime is registered or not. Learned Counsel would seek the matter to be closed with liberty to approach the appropriate authority in case the grievance subsists.
The liberty is granted and the Writ Petition will stand closed accordingly. Sd/- C. JAYACHANDRAN JUDGE SKP/26-03 W. P. (C. ) No. 15810 of 2013 2025:KER:25963 - 4 - APPENDIX OF WP(C) 15810/2013 PETITIONER’S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 P1- TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE ON 31. 07. 2012. EXHIBIT P2 P2- TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE ON 25. 08. 2012. EXHIBIT P3 P3- TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE ON 16. 11. 2012. EXHIBIT P4 P4- TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 15. 01. 2013 BEFORE HOME MINISTER. EXHIBIT P5 P5- TRUE COPY OF COMMUNICATION FROM THE ADDL. PRIVATE SECRETARY, HOME AND VIGILANCE MINISTRY, DATED 23. 04. 2013. EXHIBIT P6 P6- TRUE COPY OF THE ENQUIRY REPORT DATED 21. 08. 2012 SUBMITTED BY V. R. USHA KUMARI,DY. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, STATE WOMEN CELL.
RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL TRUE COPY P. A. TO JUDGE
Source: High Court of Kerala. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.