V.Visalakshi v. Amidala Rajani
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2026-01-06. V.Visalakshi v. Amidala Rajani. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
| 34431 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA CIViL REVISION PETITION NO: 2569 OF 2019 Petition under Article 227 of lhe Constitution of lndia, aggrieved by the order dated 14. O8. 2019 in lA No. 220 of 2019 in OS No. 2O14 of 2017 on the file of the Court of the 1Oth Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Courts, at Hyderabad. Between: 1. V. Visalakshi, W/o Late V. V. Subramanyam, aged about 60 years, Occ: Household, ilo 12-13-70517 & 8, Flat No. 405, SS Heights, Nagarjuna Nagar, Tarnaka, Secunderabad -50001 7, Telangana. 2. V. V. Nagaraju, S/o Late V-B. Kumaraswamy, aged about 49 years, occ: Private Service, R/o 10-5-79'l/3/8, Sai Nagar, North Lallaguda, Hyderabad-SOOO17. 3. V. V. Sidhartha, S/o Late V. V. Subramanyam, aged about 24 years, occ. Student, No 12-13-70517 & 8, Flat No.
405, SS Heights, Nagarjuna Nagar, Tarnaka, Secunde rabad-50001 7, Telangana. REVISION PETITIONERS/ PETITIONERS/PLAINTIFFS AND Amidala Rajani, d/o Late S. Ratnamma, aged about 54 years, occ: t-lgqsetpf ! , R/o 2-2-1i6711013A, Tilaknagar, Bagh Amberpet, Hyderabad-500 o44, Telangana. RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/DEFENDANT lA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay atl further proceedings in OS No. 2014 of 2017 on the file of the Hon'ble 1Oth Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Courts, at Hyderabad. Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri. P S Rajasekhar Counsel for the Respondent: Sri. T Sanjay Rao The Court made the following: ORDER IN THE IIIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TE], \NGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NA]{ )IKONDA DATE: 06. 01. 2o26 CTVIL REVISION PETITI oN NO. 2569 0F 12 )19 Between: V. Visalakshi W/ o late V. V.
Subramanyam Pe'i ioners I And others. And ... Res ronclent Amidala Raj ani D/o late S. Ratnamma. ORDER karned counsel attached to the office of Sri P. S. Rajasekhar, learnecl counsel for the petitioners, submits that the cause in the revision petil i I r does not survive for further adjudication and it l. t ts become infructuous. 2. Recording the said submission, the r- r'il Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shz I be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. . IANDRA SEKHAR , )UTY : REGISTRAR / / //TRUE COPYII ;ECTION OFFICER \ To 1 The 1Oth Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Courts, at Hydera ;ad 2 One CC to Sn. P S Rajasekhar, Advocate [OPUC] One CC to Sri. T Sanjay Rao, Advocate [OPUCI Two CD Copies N:i: . =:1l# HIGH COURT ) DATED: 0610112026 E SIA i \ c Zi 6 g rtB ? 0 i\c * I \ l. 'Fs --=. - ORDER CRP. No. 2569 of 2019 DISMISSING THE CRL. PETITION AS WITHDRAWN L \9
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.