SARATHLAL, v. THE SECRETARY,
Court: High Court of Kerala
Bench: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D. K. SINGH
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Kerala judgment dated 2024-07-30. SARATHLAL, v. THE SECRETARY,. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH TH TUESDAY, THE 30 DAY OF JULY 2024 / 8TH SRAVANA, 1946 WP(C) NO. 27023 OF 2024 PETITIONER/S: SARATHLAL, AGED 37 YEARS, S/O. SIVANKUTTY, THOTTATHIVILAYIL, KOMALLOOR P. O. , ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, PIN – 690505. BY ADV. SRI. SAJEEV KUMAR K. GOPAL RESPONDENTS: THE SECRETARY, THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, CIVIL STATION, CIVIL STATION P. O. , ALAPPUZHA, PIN – 688001. BY ADV. SRI. S. GOPINATHAN – SR. GP THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30. 07. 2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: DINESH KUMAR SINGH, J. -------------------------- W. P. (C) No. 27023 of 2024 -------------------------th Dated this the 30 day of July, 2024 JUDGMENT 1.
The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to consider and pass orders on Exhibit P-2 request of the petitioner for revision of timing in respect of his stage carriage bearing No. KL-01AW-7846 after hearing the petitioner and other interested operators. 2. The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that for the purpose of avoiding time clash with the other operators as more services has been introduced in the route and also for providing traveling facility to the public, slight changes to the existing timing is necessary and therefore, he has submitted Exhibit P-2 request for revision of timings. He further submits that the respondent is not taking any steps to conduct timing conference and any further delay in considering Exhibit P-2, the petitioner will be put to difficulties. 3.
The learned Government Pleader submits that necessary decision will be taken on the application of the petitioner in accordance with the law after affording an opportunity of hearing to all affected parties. 4. Considering the said stand of the learned Government Pleader, the present writ petition stands finally disposed of with a direction to the respondent to consider the petitioner’s Exhibit P-2 request in accordance with the law after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and other interested operators, within a period of two months and pass necessary orders. Sd/- DINESH KUMAR SINGH JUDGE Svn APPENDIX OF WP(C) 27023/2024 PETITIONER’S EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO. C2/236/2017/A DATED 14-02-2017 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER FOR REVISION OF TIMINGS ALONG WITH THE PROPOSED SET OF TIMINGS DATED 24-06-2024
Source: High Court of Kerala. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.