SHAHEEN SHAIKH SON OF SHRI ABDUL KHALEEL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
Court: High Court of Rajasthan
Bench: ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Rajasthan judgment dated 2024-12-11. SHAHEEN SHAIKH SON OF SHRI ABDUL KHALEEL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN. Read the judgment and case details on...
Judgment text
[2024:RJ-JP:50952] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S. B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11238/2024 Arjun S/o Shri Hansraj, R/o Village Jethana, P. S. Panwad, District Jhalawar, At Present R/o Tenant Kaila Devi Mandir, Premnagar-Ii, P. s. Udhyog Nagar, Kota (Raj. ) (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Kota) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S. B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11239/2024 Ajay S/o Shri Bhanwar Singh, R/o House No. 340, Keshavpura, Sector-4, P. s. Mahavir Nagar, Kota (Raj. ) (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Kota). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent S. B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11561/2024 Shaheen Shaikh Son Of Shri Abdul Khaleel, R/o Gali No. 4, Samshan Road, Sanjay Nagar, Police Station Bheemganj Mandi, Kota Rajasthan.
(At Present Accused-Petitioner Are Confined In Central In Central Jail Kota) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P. P. ----Respondent S. B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12046/2024 Sonu Chobdar S/o Ramdayal, R/o Village Boriya Kalan, Police Station Sangor, District Kota Rural, Rajasthan. At Present Resident Of In Front Of The Government School, Premnagar-Ii, Police Station Udhyog Nagar, District Kota City, Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Kota). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent [2024:RJ-JP:50952] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-11238/2024] For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajesh Gadwal, Mr. Waseem Akram Mr. Pallav Sharma, Mr. Avtar Singh Rathore For Respondent(s) : Mr. Devi Singh, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 11/12/2024 1. The instant bail applications have been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioners, who have been arrested in connection with FIR No. 237/2024 registered at Police Station R. K.
Puram, Kota City for the offences punishable under Sections 127(7), 140(2), 308(5), 115(2), 61(2), (A) of BNS. 2. Learned counsels for the petitioners submit that petitioners have falsely been implicated in these cases. Counsel submits that simple case of hot-talks have been given colour of criminal offences. Petitioners are in custody since their date of arrest. Counsel submits that charge-sheet has already been filed. There are no criminal antecedents against the petitioners and further custody of the petitioners would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned PP oppose the submissions made by counsel for the petitioners. He submits that some cases have also been registered against the petitioners. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5.
Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners; especially the fact that investigation has been completed, chargesheet has been filed and trial will take time in its conclusion but without commenting anything on the [2024:RJ-JP:50952] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-11238/2024] merits/demerits of the case, I deem it fit and proper to allow this bail application. 6. This bail applications are accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners (1) Arjun S/o Shri Hansraj, (2) Ajay S/o Shri Bhanwar Singh, (3) Shaheen Shaikh Son Of Shri Abdul Khaleel, and (4) Sonu Chobdar S/o Ramdayal, shall be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.
25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. It is made clear that the accused-petitioners shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and they shall mark their presence on first Monday of every month in the concerned police station during trial. 8. If any breach of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial court to cancel the bail granted to them by this Court. 9. Office is directed to send copy of this order forthwith to the accused petitioners through concerned Jail Superintendent. Office is also directed to send copy of this order to the concerned trial court forthwith.
After receiving copy of this order, the learned trial court shall intimate the accused petitioners regarding these bail granting orders. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J Pcg/132 to 135
Source: High Court of Rajasthan. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.