Skip to main content
LawSphereX

ANIL KUMAR v. STATE OF HP AND ORS

Court: High Court of Himachal Pradesh

Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE L. NARAYANA SWAMY,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court of Himachal Pradesh judgment dated 2020-12-28. ANIL KUMAR v. STATE OF HP AND ORS. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.

Judgment text

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 6288 of 2020. Date of Decision : December 28, 2020. Anil Kumar ... Petitioner. Versus State of H. P. & Others ... Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice L. Narayana Swamy, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Anoop Chitkara, Judge. 1 Whether approved for reporting? No. For the petitioner : Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Ashok Sharma, A. G. with Ms. Rita Goswami & Mr. Adarsh Sharma, Addl. A. Gs. , for respondents No. 1 & 2. COURT PROCEEDINGS CONVENED THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE Anoop Chitkara, Judge (oral). The petitioner, who is working as Junior Engineer, Jal Shakti Section Chakmoh under Jal Shakti Division Barsar, District Hamirpur, H. P. , and is under transfer to Jal Shakti, Sub Division Galore, District Bilarpur, H. P. , has come up before this Court seeking cancellation of the impugned order of transfer dated 17. 12. 2020, Annexure P-1. 2. Notice. Mr.

Adarsh Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General appears and accepts service of notice on behalf of respondents No. 1 and 2. Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 3. In view of the nature of the order, we propose to pass, no response is required from the respondents. 4. Consequently, this petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to make representation to the respondent/authorities concerned, within one week from today, in the light of the transfer policy. On receipt of such representation, the respondent/authorities shall decide the representation of the petitioner, in the light of the transfer policy occupying the field, within two weeks. Subject to filing of representation within the time-frame mentioned above, the impugned order dated 17. 12. 2020, Annexure P-1, qua the petitioner, shall remain stayed. Pending application(s), if any, are closed. Copy Dasti. (L. Narayana Swamy) Chief Justice.

(Anoop Chitkara), Judge December 28, 2020 (ps)

Source: High Court of Himachal Pradesh. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.