T.SRI HARI KUMAR BHAGAVAT v. THE COMMISSIONER
Court: Madras High Court
Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN
Judgment date:
Case summary
Madras High Court judgment dated 2026-04-29. T.SRI HARI KUMAR BHAGAVAT v. THE COMMISSIONER. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
WP No. 8552 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 29. 04. 2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR. SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G. ARUL MURUGAN WP No. 8552 of 2026 T. Sri Hari Kuamr Bhagavat No. 27, Thanikachalam Road T. Nagar, Chennai 600017 : Petitioner Vs 1. The Commissioner Greater Chennai Corporation Rippon Buildings Poonamallee High Road Chennai 600003 2. The Zonal Officer Zone XV Greater Chennai Corporation Sholinganallur Chennai 600119. 3. The Assistant Executive Engineer Greater Chennai Corporation No. 1, ECR Main Road Division 194 Injambakkam, Chennai 600115. 4. The Tahsildar, Sholinganallur Taluk No. 1, 1st Cross Street Newkumaran nagar Shozinganallur - 119. 5. M. Sekar D. No. 43 Mettust Chinnandikuppam Injambakkam Chennai 600115. : Respondents Page 1 of 4 https://www. mhc. tn. gov. in/judis WP No.
8552 of 2026 Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing respondents 1 to 4 to demolish all illegal/Unauthorised constructions in and around Mettu Street th Chinnandikuppam Injambakkam Village of the 5 respondent and like that of 5th respondent by taking action based on petitioner’s representation dated 08. 10. 2024 within a reasonable time fixed by this court. For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents : Mr. Abishek Murthy, Standing counsel, for respondents 1 to 3 Mr. Habeeb Rahman, Government Advocate, for respondent No. 4 ORDER (Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) When the matter was taken up for consideration on 21. 04. 2026, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. The matter was adjourned to be posted today. 2. Even today, there is no appearance on behalf of the petitioner.
It appears that the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the petitioner have lost interest in prosecuting this petition. Page 2 of 4 https://www. mhc. tn. gov. in/judis WP No. 8552 of 2026 3. Accordingly, this petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution. There will be no order as to costs. (SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CJ. ) (G. ARUL MURUGAN, J. ) 29. 04. 2026 Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No tar To 1. The Commissioner Greater Chennai Corporation Rippon Buildings Poonamallee High Road Chennai 600003 2. The Zonal Officer Zone XV Greater Chennai Corporation Sholinganallur Chennai 600119. 3. The Assistant Executive Engineer Greater Chennai Corporation No. 1, ECR Main Road Division 194 Injambakkam, Chennai 600115. 4. The Tahsildar, Sholinganallur Taluk No. 1, 1st Cross Street Newkumaran nagar Shozinganallur - 119. Page 3 of 4 https://www. mhc. tn. gov. in/judis WP No. 8552 of 2026 THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND G. ARUL MURUGAN, J. (tar) WP No. 8552 of 2026 29. 04.
2026 Page 4 of 4 https://www. mhc. tn. gov. in/judis
Source: Madras High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.