Sri Shekhar Chandra Podder v. The State of Tripura and 2 others
Court: High Court of Tripura
Bench: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE T. AMARNATH GOUD
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Tripura judgment dated 2024-11-04. Sri Shekhar Chandra Podder v. The State of Tripura and 2 others. Read the judgment and case details on...
Judgment text
HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AGARTALA WP(C) No. 644 of 2024 Sri Shekhar Chandra Podder ………Petitioner(s) Versus The State of Tripura & Ors. …….. Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Somik Deb, Sr. Advocate. Mr. H. Sarkar, Advocate. Mr. P. L Debbarma, Advocate. Mr. P. Chakraborty, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Kohinoor N. Bhattacharya,G. A. HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE T. AMARNATH GOUD ORDER 04. 11. 2024 Heard Mr. Somik Deb, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. H. Sarkar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Kohinoor N. Bhattacharya, learned G. A, appearing for the respondent- State. [2] This petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following reliefs:- “I.
Issue Rule, calling upon the respondents and each one of them, to show cause as to why a Writ of Certiorari and/or in the nature thereof, shall not be issued for directing them to transmit the records, relevant to the subject matter of this writ petition for rendering substantive and conscionable justice to the petitioner. II. Issue rule Calling upon the respondents and each one of them, to show cause as to why a Writ of Mandamus and/or in the nature thereof, shall not be issued for mandating/directing the respondents, to forthwith release the balance amount of Rs. 28,23,746/-, as stated, in favour of the petitioner, along with Interest @ 12% per annum, on to the said undisputed amounts, from the respective dates the amounts fell due, upto the date of actual payment. iii. After hearing the parties, be pleased to make the Rule Absolute in terms of i. to ii above;” [3] Heard and perused the evidence on record.
[4] After perusal of the record, it has been seen that the petitioner herein submitted a legal notice dated 06. 08. 2024 through his engaged counsel addressed to the concerned respondents, ventilating his grievances but the same stood unattended till now. [5] In view of such circumstances, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this writ petition is disposed of, directing the concerned-respondents to consider the case of the petitioner in light of the legal notice dated 06. 08. 2024 in accordance with law within a period of 03(three) months from the date of receipt of the copy of this order. [6] With the above observation and direction, this present writ petition stands disposed of. As a sequel, miscellaneous application(s), pending if any, shall stand closed. JUDGE Paritosh
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.