Narala ChandraShekar, v. The State of Telangana,

Court: High Court for State of Telangana

Bench: J SREENIVAS RAO

Judgment date: 2025-12-24

Case summary

High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2025-12-24. Narala ChandraShekar, v. The State of Telangana,. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.

Judgment text

I [ 33031 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO l. A. Nos. 3 and 4 of 2025 ln/And CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 17215 OF 2025 Between: Narala ChandraShekar, S/o Late N. Satyanarayan a, Age 47 Years, Occ Electrical Business. R/oH. No2-1-549/l,Nallakunta, Vidyanagar,Hydetabad-44 ... Petitioner/Accused in Crlp and LA. No. 4 ot 2025 AND 1. The State of Telangana,, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana At Hyderabad. ... Respondent in Crlp and l. A. No. 4 ot 2025 2. Narala Hima Bindu, Wo Narala Chandra Shekar, D/o Late A. Dayanand, Aged about 35 Years, H. No 12-1-490l40lN2,Suraj garden Function Hall, Tappachaputra Road, AsifNagar, Hyderabad. ... RespondenUDefacto Complainant in Crlp and l. A. No.

4 o12025 Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the criminal proceedings iri CC No. 399312021 on the file of Xlll Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Nampally, Hyderabad. a. t. A. NO :2OF 2025 Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including appearance of the petitioners/accused in CC No. 3993/2021 on the file of Xlll Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Nampally, Hyderabad. pending disposal of the quash petition. t. A. NO: oF 2025 Between: N. arala^Hima Bindu, WoNaralq ClanQrq Shekar, D/o Late A. Dayanand, Aged about 35 Years, H. No 12-1490l41lN2,Suraj garden Function H-all, Tappachaputra Road, AsifNagar, Hyderabad. - . Petitioner/RespondenUDefacto Complainant AND 1. ChandraShel<ar, S/o Late N.

Satyanarayana, Age years, lgrqlg 47 Occ Electrical Business. R/oH. No2-t-549/l,Natlakunta, Vidyanigar,Hyderabid-Aq ... Petitioner/Accused 2. The State of Telangana,, Rep. by its Public prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana At Hyderabad. ... Respondent Petition under Section 359(6) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner to compound the offence of Sec. 499_A lpC and Sec. 4 and 6 of D. P. Act against the respondents/accused in c. c. No. 3993/202'1 on the file of Xlll Additionat chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Nampally, Hyderabad. LA. NO: 4OF 2025 Petition under Section 359(2) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal petition, the High court may be pleased to permit the petitioner to compromise in C. C. No.

399312021 on the file of Xlll Additional Chief Metropotitan Magistrate, Nampally, Hyderabad by allowing the Criminal Petition. I This Petition coming on for hearing upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Crriminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Ms S. RAMA SUBHADRA, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla, Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No. 1 and of Sri K. Raja MOhan Babu, Advocate for the Respondent No. 2. The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER {'' IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENTVAS RAO I. A. Nos. 3 and 4 of 2o25 IN AND CRIMINAL PETITION No. 17215 of 2O25 Date:24. 12. 2O25 Between Narala Chandra Shekar . ... Petitioner/Accused AND The State of Telangana, rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad, and another ..

Respondents COMMON ORDER: This Criminal Petition has been filed by the petitioner/accused seeking to quash the proceedings in C. C. No. 3993 of 2021 on the file of the XIII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Nampally, Hyderabad. a 2. Heard Ms. S. Rama Subhadra, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. K. Raja Mohan Babu, learned counsel for respondent No. 2, and Mr. Jithender Rao Veeramalla, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, appearing on behalf of rdspondent No. 1-State. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that during the pendency of the present Criminal Petition, at the instance of the well \(, wishers, relatives and elders, the parties have settled the disputes pending between them and entered into compromise and filed Joint compromise Memo. Accordingly, the parties have filed I. A. Nos. 3 4 of 2025 seeking permission to compound the offences and to the compromise respectively. 4. This court uide order, dated 19. 12. 2025, directed the parties i. e.

, the petitioner and respondent No. 2, to appear before the court Legal Services committee, Hyderabad, on or before 23. r2. 2o2s. In compliance of the said orders, the Secretary, High court Services committee, has submitted report, dated 22. L2. 2o25, stating that the petitioner and respondent No. 2 were duly identified with copies of their Aadhar Cards. It is further stated that the parties willfully and without any coercion entered into compromise. 5. In view of the said report and also in view of the compromise entered between the petitioner and respondent No. 2 as well as submissions made by the respective parties, I. A. Nos. 3 and 4 of are allowed. consequently, the proceedings in c. c. No. 3993 of on the file of the XIII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Nampally, Hyderabad, are hereby quashed against the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the criminal petition is allowed, subject to payment of costs of Rs.

S,Ooo/- (Rupees live thousand only) to the High court Legal Services committee, Hyderabad, and Rs. S,ooo/- (Rupees / / thousand only) to the Telangana High Court Advocates'Association, Hyderabad, by the petitioner, on or before 09. 01. 2026. Miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. ASSIsTAi? ,i? 3|. TJIA //TRUE COPY// OFFICER To, 1. The Xll Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Nampally, Hyderabad. 2. The Station House Officer, WPS, DD Police Station, Hyderabad City. 3. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT] 4. One CC to Ms S. RAMA SUBHADRA Advocate [OPUC] 5. One CC to SRI K. RAJA MOHAN BABU, Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CD Copies A copy of Joint Memo of compromise enclosed herewith Note: Total Amount of Rs. 10,000/- ( Rupees Ten thousand only ) has been paid by Ms S. Rama Subhadra, Counsel for the Petitioner as directed by the Hon'ble Court vide order dated 24. 12. 2025 as Rs.

5,000/- ( Rupees Five thousand only ) to the i) "High Court Legal Services Committee, High Court for the State of Telangana, High Court Buildings Hyderabad. and Rs. 5,000/- ( Rupees Five thousand only ) to the Telangana High Court Advocates Association, Hyderabad and filed Memo as proof of compliance UsR No. 151059 of 2025. G NVB/PSL ( HIGH COURT DATED:2411212025 1 HE SIA ( COMMON ORDER :.. <) l. A. Nos. 3 and 4 ot 2025 O B JAN 2tj26 ln/And * ) CRLP. No. 17215 ot 2025 I ALLOWING THE CRIMINAL PETITION AND I. A. Nos. 3 D 4 0F 2025 d 9L i MEMORANDUM OF' CRIMINAL MTSC. PETITION IN THE IIIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TFLAIICANA AT HYDERABAD crr. P. No. lNtf or2025 (on the fire of . p. s. , wps. DD,t-r? ':xtt; 4e8-A rpc rtw. 4&6 D. p. AcQ Between: Narala ChandraShekar, S/o Late N. Satyanarayana, Aged about 47 years, Occ:Electrical Business, R/oH. No2- I -549l l,Nallakunta, Vidyanagar,Hyder abad-44 . . Petitioners/Accused . : And l)The State ofTelangunr,'R. p.

' by its Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana At Hyderabad .. Respondent 2)NaralaHimaB induWoNarala Chandr:a Shekar, Late A. Dayanand,Aged about years, 35 l{o H. No, 12- I 49 0 / 40 I N2,Suraj garden Funct ion Hal l, TappachaputraRoad, AsifNagar, Hyderabad. . . Respondent/ Defacto Complairmnt BY . -' ,,r. . i . : l . t I 1) The petitioners are Accused in c. c. No . 3gg3/202[ on the file of Honble XIII Addl chief Metropolitrrn Magistrate, Nampally, Hyderabad. a. 2) The petitioners/accused ancr 2nd respondent herein have settled I their disputeq and compromised,in : the matter and the defacto ii comprainant j: | .. : .. 1 ,. . ,. I r r : has agreed tp withdraw criminal czure filed against the petitioners/accused herein in the best interest of the parties.

The 2nd respondent submits that after filing of the above , criminal case against the petitioners/Abcused, with the intervention of elders and welr-wishers, she does not want to pursue the matter and intends to withdraw the case filed by her against the petitioners/accused. -J-i i ,U. {-}-' I I I I lt 7-t ,\ /1\ 3) The 2nd respondent/defacto complainant submits that as the parties shall agreed that the criminal case pending against the petitioners/accused are complainant and they be withdrawn by the 2nd respondenU defacto bound by the terms and conditions of this compromise. prays that this Hon'ble court may be pleased to Hence, the parties herein quash the criminal proceedings in c. c. N o. 39931202L on the file of Honble XIII Addl chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Nampally, Hyderabad' and. to pass such other and order or orders as deem fit and proper, in the interest ofjustice. N"'c"e g : Petitioner /Accus6d lt^-- Counsel for the Petitioners/Accused M ttr: #J'- .. :.

i 2nd Respondent/ ComPlainant the2 respondent /Complainant ! D

Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.