RAMHET v. BEWA BUTTI BAI
Court: High Court of Madhya Pradesh
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Madhya Pradesh judgment dated 2024-01-02. RAMHET v. BEWA BUTTI BAI. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AVANINDRA KUMAR SINGH nd ON THE 2 OF JANUARY, 2024 SECOND APPEAL No. 844 of 2006 BETWEEN:- 1. RAMHET S/O MOUNIRAM BRAHMIN. , AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, OCCUPATION: AGRICULTURER, R /O VILLAGE GHUISA TEH. AMARPATAN DISTT. SATNA (MADHYA PRADESH) 2. NEERAJ, S/O RAMHET BRAHMIN, MINOR THROUGH NATURAL GUARDIAN RAMHET AGED ABOUT 10 YEARS, R/O VILLAGE GHUISA TEH. AMARPATAN DISTT. SATNA (MADHYA PRADESH) 3. VIJAYA KUMAR S/O RAMHET BRAHMIN, AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST R/O VILLAGE GHUINSA TEH. TALA DISTT. SATNA (MADHYA PRADESH)(MADHYA PRADESH) ..... APPELLANTS (NONE FOR THE APPELLANTS) AND 1. BEWA BUTTI BAI W/O LATE RAMSUNDAR BRAHMIN, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, OCCUPATION: AGRICULTUR & HOME WIFE R / O GHUISA TEH. AMARPATAN, P. O. MAJHGAWAN DISTT. SATNA (MADHYA PRADESH) 2. MEERA D/O RAMSUNDAR BRAHMIN, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, OCCUPATION: AGRICULTURE & H O U S E WI F E R / O V I L L A G E GHUISA TEH. AMARPATAN DISTT.
SATNA MP, PRESENT R/O KHRIYA, TAH. RAMPUR BHAGHELAN, P. O. CHORATA, DISTT. SATNA (MADHYA PRADESH) 3. RAMBHUVAN S/O MOUNIRAM BRAHMIN, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCCUPATION: AGRICULTURE VILL. GHUISA, TEH. AMARPATAN, DISTT. SATNA (MADHYA PRADESH) 4. RAJENDRA PRASAD S/O MOUNIRAM BRAHMIN, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, OCCUPATION: AGRICULTURE, VILL. GHUISA, TEH. AMARPATAN, DISTT. SATNA (MADHYA PRADESH) 5. JAGDISH PRASAD S/O MOUNIRAM BRAHMIN, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCCUPATION: AGRICULTURE, VILL. GHUISA, TEH. AMARPATAN, DISTT. SATNA (MADHYA PRADESH) 6. SMT. SAVITRI W/O LATE RAMBIHARI, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCCUPATION: AGRICULTURE VILL. GHUISA, TEH. AMARPATAN, DISTT. SATNA (MADHYA PRADESH) 7. THE STATE OF M. P. THROUGH COLLECTOR SATNA (MADHYA PRADESH) ..... RESPONDENTS (NONE FOR RESPONDENT NOS. 1 TO 6. SHRI RAJEEV PANDEY - P. L. FOR THE STATE) T h is appeal coming on for orders this day, t h e cou rt passed the following: ORDER None appeared for the appellants even in pass-over round. Respondents No.
1 and 3 expired. Therefore, this Appeal is dismissed as abated. Let a copy of this order be sent along with the record of the concerned court. (AVANINDRA KUMAR SINGH) JUDGE nd Digitally signed by NIDHI DAVE Date: 2024. 01. 04 10:42:02 -08'00'
Source: High Court of Madhya Pradesh. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.