THANKA v. DISTRICT COLLECTOR
Court: High Court of Kerala
Bench: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Kerala judgment dated 2020-12-15. THANKA v. DISTRICT COLLECTOR. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. SURESH KUMAR TUESDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2020 / 24TH AGRAHAYANA, 1942 WP(C). No. 25370 OF 2020(U) PETITIONER/S: THANKA, AGED 75 YEARS, W/O. SHANKARAN, ECHERATH HOUSE, PUZHAKKAL, THRISSUR-680 553. BY ADVS. SRI. N. B. ANOOP SMT. M. S. SHAMLA RESPONDENT/S: 1 DISTRICT COLLECTOR CIVIL STATION, THRISSUR 680 003. 2 REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, THRISSUR, THRISSUR 680 003. 3 LOCAL LEVEL MONITORING COMMITTEE, ADATH GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REPRESENTED BY ITS CONVENER, (AGRICULTURAL OFFICER, KRISHI BHAVAN, PUZHAKKAL, THRISSUR 680 553). 4 TAHASILDAR, THRISSUR TALUK OFFICE, THRISSUR-680 020. 5 VILLAGE OFFICER, PUZHAKKAL VILLAGE OFFICE, THRISSUR 680 553. 6 STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT,SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001. SRI. K. J. MANURAJ, GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15. 12. 2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.
P. (C) No. 25370 of 2020 W. P. (C) No. 25370 of 2020 ----------------------------------------------- J U D G M E N T Ext. P3 is an application preferred by the petitioner in Form No. 6 of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Rules for permission to utilize a land held by her, which is an un-notified land in terms of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008, for other purposes. The grievance of the petitioner in the writ petition concerns the inaction on the part of the second respondent in taking a decision on Ext. P3 application. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as also the learned Government Pleader. 3. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition directing the second respondent to take up and pass appropriate orders on Ext. P3 application in accordance with law, if the same is received and pending, after affording the petitioner an opportunity of hearing.
Ordered accordingly. This shall be done within three months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition by the petitioner. W. P. (C) No. 25370 of 2020 It is made clear that the hearing in terms of this judgment can either be physical or through video conference. Sd/- P. B. SURESH KUMAR, JUDGE rkj W. P. (C) No. 25370 of 2020 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT DATED 06/05/2020. EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE EXTRACT DATA BANK DATED 18/11/2017. EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 01/10/2020 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE CHALLAN DATED 11/05/2020. EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGES OF THE DATA BANK WHICH CONTAINS THE DETAILS OF THE PROPERTY OF THE PETITIONER.
Source: High Court of Kerala. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.