PRIYANK ACHARYA v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
Court: High Court of Rajasthan
Bench: YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Rajasthan judgment dated 2026-08-10. PRIYANK ACHARYA v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
[2026:RJ-JP:37957] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14703/2026 CNR: RJHC010670242026 | URN: CW / 26800U / 2026 Priyank Acharya S/o Shri Deshant Acharya, Aged About 23 Years, Resident Of Brahman Mohalla, Partapur, Tehsil Garhi, District Banswara (Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of Administrative Reforms Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Rajasthan Employees Selection Board, Rajya Krishi Prabandh Sansthan Parisar, Durgapura, Jaipur Through Its Secretary. 3. The Joint Director (School Education), Udaipur Division, Udaipur. 4. The Superintendent, Maharana Bhupal Hospital, Udaipur. 5. The Chief Medical And Health Officer, Banswara, District Banswara. 6. Bhanwar Singh Borana S/o Shri Poonam Singh Borana, Aged About 27 Years, Sr. No. 5056, Rank No. 906194, Roll Number 3507278. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Inderjeet Yadav For Respondent(s) : Mr.
Manish Patel HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT Order 10/08/2026 fo}ku vf/koDrk ;kph dh vksj ls ;g fuosnu fd;k x;k fd ifjf'k"B&9 la;qDr funs'kd ¼Ldwy f'k{kk½ mn;iqj lEHkkx] mn;iqj ds i= fnukad 12-03-2026 esa v/kh{kd egksn; }kjk egkjk. kk Hkwiky fpfdRlky;] mn;iqj dks i= Hkstk tkdj tkap djokbZ xbZ Fkh] ml tkap dh fjiksVZ ;kph dks ugha crkbZ xbZ gS] [2026:RJ-JP:37957] (2 of 2) [CW-14703/2026] ml tkap esa ;kph dh fnO;kaxrk 40 izfr'kr gksuk ikbZ xbZ gS vFkok ugha] ;g Hkh ;kph dks Li"V ugha gS vkSj ;kph }kjk ckj&ckj fuosnu djus ds ckotwn foHkkx }kjk dksbZ tkudkjh ugha nh tk jgh gSA ,slh voLFkk esa ;kph dks ifjf'k"B&9 ds Øe esa v;kph la[;k 3 la;qDr funs'kd ¼Ldwy f'k{kk½ mn;iqj lEHkkx] mn;iqj ds le{k ,d lIrkg esa vH;kosnu is'k djus dh vuqefr fn, tkus vkSj vH;kosnu dk fuLrkj. k 15 fnu ds Hkhrj fd, tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA fo}ku vf/koDrk v;kph dh vksj ls ;g fuosnu fd;k x;k fd ;kph l{ke vf/kdkjh ds le{k vH;kosnu le; ij is'k djrk gS] rks ml vH;kosnu dk fuLrkj.
k 15 fnu ds Hkhrj dj fn;k tk,xkA lquk x;kA ;kph dh izkFkZuk dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, ;kfpdk dk bl izdkj fuLrkj. k fd;k tkrk gS fd ifjf'k"B&9 ds Øe esa fnO;kaxrk ds ckjs esa dh xbZ tkap fjiksVZ v;kph la[;k 3 foHkkx dks izkIr gqbZ gS] mldks en~nsutj j[krs gq, ;kph ds }kjk ,d lIrkg esa vH;kosnu is'k fd, tkus ij ml vH;kosnu dk fuLrkj. k 15 fnu ds Hkhrj fd;k tkosA (YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT),J 29/Gaurav Gehlot
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.