Mr. Mohd Sajid Ali v. Vinay Reddy
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: K.LAKSHMAN
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2025-12-05. Mr. Mohd Sajid Ali v. Vinay Reddy. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
[ 3{68 ] IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2797 OF 2024 Contempt Case filed Under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondent herein for willfully violating the Orderc of the High Court dated 19/612024 passed in W. P. No. 15196 of 2O24. Between: Mr. Mohd Sajid Ali, S/o Late Mohd Jaffer Ali, Aged about. 55 years, . Business R/o. H. No. 1-1-4l10, Balnagar, Medchal Malkajgiri Dist. T. S. ... PETITIONER AND Vinay Reddy, S/o Not known to Petitioner Aged. Not known to Petitioner Occ. Tahsildar Serilingampally Mandal, Serilingampally, Ranga Reddy District. ... RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri Mirza Mahmood Ali Baig (No Representation) Counsel for the Respondents: AGP for Assignment The Court made the following: ORDER IN THE }IITGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TIIE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.
LAKSHMAN CONTEMPT E No. 2797 of 2024 THE 5,h DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 Between Mr. Mohd S,ajid Ali ... Petitioner AND Vinay Reddy ... Respondent ORAL ORJDER: Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Assignment, on instructions, would submit that CCLA has decided to constitute a Five Man Committee to revisit all the applications submitted by the citizens seeking regrlarization of property in terms of G. o. Ms. Nos. 58 and 59 dated 30. 12. 2014. He has not constituted the said Committee so far. Therefore, several writ petitions and contempt petitions are pending - --on the'said issue. Citizens are filing several writ petitions seeking direction to the District Collectors to consider the applications submitted blr them for regularization of their properties in terms of the \ t l 2 I I I i I I } aforesaid G. os. Even then, ; ccLA is not taking any steps to constitute f i I the said Committee. I I t ! * !
2- The said apprications submitted by the citizens including the I petitioner herein in terms of G. o. Ms. Nos. 5g and 59, dated 30. 12. 20t4 , and the order under contempt to the present case is dated 19. 06. 2024. ? However, I this Court granted two months time to the District Collector, I :, Ranga Reddy District to consider the online application dated i 10. 04. 2023 submitted by the petitioner in rerms of G. o. Ms. Nos. 5g and 59, dated 30. 12. 2014. Even then, petitioner filed the present contempt case against the Tahsildar, Serilingampally Mandal. There is no direction to the Tahsirdar, Serilingampaily Mandal, to consider the said online application submitted by the petitioner. 3' There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner since last three consecutive hearings. 4. In the light of the same, this contempt case is closed. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to fire fresh contempt case agarnst the District Collector, Ranga Reddy District.
I / t' As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the Contenrpt Case shall stand closed. SD/- V. HARI PRASAD UTY REGISTRAR /,TRUE COPY'/ OFFICER To, 1. One CC to Sri Mirza Mahmood Alibaig, Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP for Assignment, High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUT] 3. Two CD Copies VH/PSL E*, r' / HIGH COURT DATED: 05/1 212A25 '? ' iHE S t () 2tt26 9 zt FIB ORDER * * CC. No. 2797 ot 2024 CLOSING THE CC KS t{-f"e
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.