SMT. SUHSILABAI VISHNU KHOPE AND ORS. v. SHRI. HANUMAN SING KOTISING AND ANR.
Court: Bombay High Court
Bench: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJESH S. PATIL,NATIONAL LOK ADALAT
Judgment date:
Case summary
Bombay High Court judgment dated 2025-12-13. SMT. SUHSILABAI VISHNU KHOPE AND ORS. v. SHRI. HANUMAN SING KOTISING AND ANR. Read the judgment and case...
Judgment text
522-FA-316-2025. doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO. 316 OF 2025 Smt. Suhsilabai Vishnu Khope and Ors. .. Appellants Versus Shri Hanuman Singh Kotising and Anr. .. Respondents Adv. S. Mitra, i/b. Res Juris, for the Appellant. CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J. (HEAD OF THE PANEL) S. R. AGRAWAL REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL - II) P. R. NAVALE OSD AT JUDICIAL – I DATE : 13. 12. 2025 P. C. 1. Mentioned. Not on board. Taken on board. 2. Both the learned Counsel submits that parties have amicably th settled their dispute and have tendered the Consent Terms dated 13 December, 2025. 3. Both the learned Counsels state that they have explained the terms to the signatories and the signatories have signed the Consent terms after understanding the contents. Both the learned Counsels Anand 1 of 7 522-FA-316-2025. doc confirm their signatures on the Consent terms and also confirm the signatures of their respective clients.
They also identify the presence of their respective clients in the Lok Adalat. 4. The said Consent Terms is taken on record and marked “X” for identification purpose. The statements made in the Consent Terms are accepted as undertaking given to this Lok Adalat. All the undertakings are also accepted. 5. For ease of reference, scanned copy of the Consent Terms is reproduce herein below : Anand 2 of 7 522-FA-316-2025. doc Anand 3 of 7 522-FA-316-2025. doc Anand 4 of 7 522-FA-316-2025. doc Anand 5 of 7 522-FA-316-2025. doc Anand 6 of 7 522-FA-316-2025. o 6. The First Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the Consent Terms. 7. Refund of Court fees, as per Rules. 8. Statutory amount to be transferred to the concerned MACT. 9. In sequel, the Interim Application, if any, also stands disposed of. [P. R. NAVALE] [S. R. AGRAWAL] [RAJESH S. PATIL, J. ] OSD AT JUDICIAL – I REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL – II) HEAD OF THE PAN L MEMBER MEMBER Anand 7 of 7
Source: Bombay High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.