SMT NISHA K V v. STATE BANK OF INDIA
Court: High Court of Karnataka
Bench: D K SINGH,T.M.NADAF
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Karnataka judgment dated 2026-04-15. SMT NISHA K V v. STATE BANK OF INDIA. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
- 1 - WP No. 11498 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU TH DATED THIS THE 15 DAY OF APRIL, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T. M. NADAF WRIT PETITION NO. 11498 OF 2024 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN: SMT. NISHA K. V. , W/O A. K. CHANDRASHEKAR, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, TH NO. 711/420, 7 WARD, ND 2 CROSS, M. G. ROAD, CHATRADABEEDHI, RAMANAGAR - 562 159. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RUDRABHUSHAN C B. , ADVOCATE FOR SMT. NISHA K. V. , PARTY-IN-PERSON) AND: 1. STATE BANK OF INDIA, AUTHORISED OFFICER, VIDYANAGAR BRANCH, OPP. PANCHAYATH BHAVAN, B. M. ROAD, RAMANAGAR - 562 159. 2. MR. K. D. CHANDRA, S/O DODDIREGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 28, - 2 - WP No. 11498 of 2024 KORATAGERE DODDI, UYYAMBALLI, KANAKAPURA TALUK, MULAHALLI, RAMANAGAR, KANAKAPURA - 562 119.
…RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONTITUTION OF INDIA, 1949, PRAYING TO QUASH/SET-ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 12/03/2024 PASSED BY THE PRESIDING OFFICER, DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-2, BANGALORE, IN RA NO. 03/2021 WHICH IS PRODUCED VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND PASS ANY SUCH FURTHER ORDER/ORDERS, RELIEFS OR DIRECTIONS BY INVOKING ITS INHERENT POWERS AS THIS HON'BLE COURT DEEMS FIT AND PROPER IN REGARD TO THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE, INCLUDING "RESTORATION OF THE POSSESSION OF SCHEDULE PROPERTY" FORTHWITH, BY TAKING AN UNDERTAKING OR AFFIDAVIT THAT THE POSSESSION WILL BE DELIVERED / HANDED OVER SUBJECT TO THE OUTCOME OF THIS WRIT PETITION. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T. M. NADAF - 3 - WP No. 11498 of 2024 ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR.
JUSTICE D K SINGH) Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing the matter at length requests to dismiss the appeal as withdrawn, with liberty for the petitioner to take appropriate proceedings against the orders passed by the Debts Recovery Tribunal II, Karnataka, Bengaluru. 2. Considering the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. 3. The time consumed in prosecuting this writ petition may be considered for condoning the delay under Section 14 of Limitation Act, 1963. Sd/- (D K SINGH) JUDGE Sd/- (T. M. NADAF) JUDGE PK List No. : 1 Sl No. : 8
Source: High Court of Karnataka. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.