Ravi Kumar Mahto v. The State of Bihar
Court: Patna High Court
Bench: MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY,THE CHIEF JUSTICE-
Judgment date:
Case summary
Patna High Court judgment dated 2024-12-06. Ravi Kumar Mahto v. The State of Bihar. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Letters Patent Appeal No. 921 of 2024 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 1789 of 2024 ====================================================== Ravi Kumar Mahto Son of Ram Ekbal Mahto Resident of Village- Laguraon, P. S. - Mahua, District- Vaishali at Hajipur, Presently Mukhiya of Laguraon Bilandpur Panchayat, Block- Rajapakar, District- Vaishali at Hajipur. ... ... Appellant/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Panchayati Raj, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Principal Secretary, Panchayati Raj, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. Director, Panchayati Raj, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4. Deputy Director, Panchayati Raj Department, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur. 5. The District Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur. 6. The District Panchayati Raj Officer, Vaishali at Hajipur. 7. The Deputy Development Commissioner, Vaishali at Hajipur. 8. Block Development Officer -Cum- Block Panchayati Raj Officer, Rajapakar, Vaishali at Hajipur.
9. The Additional Chief Secretary, Panchyati Raj Department, Bihar, Patna. 10. Lok Prabhari -Cum-Commissioner, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. S. B. K. Mangalam, Advocate Mr. Awnish Kumar, Advocate Mr. Vivek Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Government Advocate (5) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 2 06-12-2024 We find absolutely no ground for entertaining an appeal from the impugned judgment. The only contention raised Patna High Court L. P. A No. 921 of 2024(2) dt. 06-12-2024 2/2 by the learned Counsel is that the hearing of writ petition may be expedited, which request can as well be made before the learned Single Judge. 2. We find absolutely no reason to entertain the appeal. 3.
The appeal is dismissed with liberty as above. (K. Vinod Chandran, CJ) (Partha Sarthy, J) Shiv/- U
Source: Patna High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.