PRIYA SURI AND ANR v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K TH HOME DEPTT AND ORS
Court: High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
Bench: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SINDHU SHARMA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Jammu and Kashmir judgment dated 2020-12-22. PRIYA SURI AND ANR v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K TH HOME DEPTT AND ORS. Read the judgment and...
Judgment text
Sr. No. 119 st Supplementary 1 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU (Through Virtual Mode) WP(C) No. 2012/2020 CM No. 7827/2020 CM No. 7828/2020 Priya Suri & another …. Petitioner(s) Through:- Mr. Aftab Malik, Advocate V/s Union Territory of J&K & ….. Respondent(s) ors. Through:- Mr. Raman Sharma, AAG CORAM : HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SINDHU SHARMA, JUDGE ORDER CM No. 7828/2020 Let the deficiencies be made good as per Circular No. 16/GS dated 29. 03. 2020 upon removal of the current lockdown. This application is disposed of as such. WP(C) No. 2012/2020 & CM No. 7827/2020 1. Petitioners seek a direction to respondent Nos. 2 to 4 to provide them police protection as they apprehend danger to their lives from respondent Nos. 5 & 6. It is submitted that the petitioners are major and have married out of their own free will. Copies of Marriage Certificate dated 27. 11. 2020 and date of birth certificates have been placed on record.
They submit that since they have solemnized the marriage against the wishes of respondent Nos. 5 & 6, as such, they are facing harassment at their hands. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners refers to the decision of the Supreme Court in Lata Singh v. State of U. P. and anr. ; 2006 (5) SCC 475, and submits that in absence of there being any legal impediment, the 2 WP(C) No. 2012 /2020 petitioners are entitled to marry according to their choice and the official respondents are duty bound to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners. 3. Both the petitioners are present through virtual mode and are identified by their counsel. 4. Perusal of the record annexed with the writ file reveals that petitioners are major and have married each other on 27. 11. 2020 according to Hindu Rights and Rituals. 5. Any person(s) having attained the age of majority are entitled to marry as per their wishes and the police department is duty bound to protect their life and liberty, if approached.
However, it appears that the petitioners have not ever approached the official respondents for their indulgence in the matter for providing protection to them. 6. Keeping in view the relief sought, this petition is disposed of, at this stage, by providing that respondent Nos. 2 to 4 shall look into the grievance of the petitioners for providing them adequate security and to ensure that nobody interferes in married life of the petitioners, if the petitioners approach them. It is made clear that no opinion has been expressed with regard to the validity of their marriage, and the police is free to take a view on the basis of the available material. If it is found that the parties are major and have married out of their own free will and consent, the necessary protection shall be extended to them. 7. Disposed of alongwith CM(s). (Sindhu Sharma) Judge JAMMU 22. 12. 2020 Ram Murti Whether the order is speaking : Yes/No Whether the order is reportable : Yes/No RAM MURTI 2020. 12.
23 13:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Source: High Court of Jammu and Kashmir. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.