HASANABBA v. M/S VIBRANT MOTORS
Court: High Court of Karnataka
Bench: RAJESH RAI K
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Karnataka judgment dated 2026-04-30. HASANABBA v. M/S VIBRANT MOTORS. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
- 1 - CRL. RP No. 1597 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU TH DATED THIS THE 30 DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 1597 OF 2024 BETWEEN: HASANABBA S/O ABOBAKKAR , AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, R/AT DOOR NO 2-17 MASIDIBETTU PUDU POST & VILLAGE BANTWAL TALUK, D. K DISTRICT, PIN - 574 143 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. T. RADHAKRISHNA SHETTY, ADVOCATE) AND: M/S VIBRANT MOTORS (VIBRANT CHEVROLET) OFFICE AT NEAR RELIANCE PETROL PUMP, S. NO. 25,30, N. H 66, KULUR, MANGALURU REPRESENTED BY ITS ASSISTANT SERVICE MANAGER & POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER JAGADISH S/O LATE PURUSHOTHAM SUVARNA AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS R/AT 10-145A, AKRAME BETTU JODU MARGA, BANTWAL, PIN- 575 013 …RESPONDENT THIS CRL. RP IS FILED U/S 397 R/W 401 OF CR. P. C (U/S 438 R/W 442 BNSS) PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGEMENT OF CONVICTION PASSED BY THE TRIAL COURT, JMFC VIII DTD 21. 10. 2021 IN CC. NO. 1670/2017 AND SET ASIDE THE JUDGEMENT IN CRL. A. NO. 156/2021 DTD 17. 01.
2024 OF - 2 - CRL. RP No. 1597 of 2024 PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, D. K. , MANGALORE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K ORAL ORDER Despite the matter being called out twice, there is no representation for the petitioner. 2. This Court vide order dated 31. 01. 2026, passed the following: "ORDER Matter called twice. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Though this petition is listed for the fifth time for compliance of office objections, office objections have not been complied" Matter is finally adjourned for compliance office objections subject to the petitioner paying cost of Rs. 1,000/- to the Advocates' Welfare Fund by the next date of hearing. List after two weeks. " - 3 - CRL. RP No. 1597 of 2024 3. Despite the said order, learned counsel for the petitioner neither paid costs of Rs. 1,000/- nor complied with the office objections, as ordered by this Court on 31. 01.
2026. 4. Though the matter is of the year 2024, it seems that the petitioner is not interested to pursue this petition. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE HKV List No. : 1 Sl No. : 8
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.