TARUNA v. STATE THROUGH SHO PS JAHANGIR PURI & ORS.
Court: High Court of Delhi
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIVEK CHAUDHARY ,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Delhi judgment dated 2025-10-31. TARUNA v. STATE THROUGH SHO PS JAHANGIR PURI & ORS. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
$~34 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI st % Date of decision:31 October, 2025 + W. P. (CRL) 3548/2025 & CRL. M. A. 32107/2025 TARUNA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Dinesh Malik (DHCLSC) with Mr. Puneet Jain and Ms. Kiffi Aggarwal, Advocates. versus STATE THROUGH SHO PS JAHANGIR PURI & ORS. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, SC with Insp. Somil Sharma. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIVEK CHAUDHARY HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T 1. Present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 528 B. N. S. S. , 2023 and petitioner, inter alia, seeks directions in the nature of Habeas Corpus to the respondents to produce the missing son of petitioner who has been taken away by respondents no. 4 and 5 in the year 2021. 2. The brief facts of the case are that on the on 16. 08. 2021 and 17. 08. 2021, respondent Nos.
4 and 5 visited the petitioner unannounced and gave her spiked sweets, took her signatures on a blank piece of paper under false pretenses. Thus, as per her case, respondents no. 4 and 5 took away her son in 2021, renamed him, and falsely claimed adoption on the strength of her signatures taken on blank paper. 3. The incident is of the year 2021 and, thus, there is, admittedly, delay of around four years in filing of the present petition. Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed W. P. (CRL) 3548/2025 1 By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Date:01. 11. 2025 16:40:46 4. Whether the adoption deed is validly executed or got prepared fraudulently is a question of fact which cannot be decided in writ petition of present nature. The aspect of delay also, somewhat, goes against the petitioner. 5.
The present petition, therefore, does not call for any interference and is, accordingly, dismissed with liberty to petitioner to approach appropriate judicial forum for seeking appropriate remedy, as permissible under law. 6. All rights and contentions of parties are, however, left open. (VIVEK CHAUDHARY) JUDGE (MANOJ JAIN) JUDGE OCTOBER 31, 2025/sw/PB Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed W. P. (CRL) 3548/2025 2 By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Date:01. 11. 2025 16:40:46
Source: High Court of Delhi. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.