Bhola Kumar @ Kaliya v. The State of Bihar
Court: Patna High Court
Bench: MR. JUSTICE R. P. MISHRA
Judgment date:
Case summary
Patna High Court judgment dated 2025-12-03. Bhola Kumar @ Kaliya v. The State of Bihar. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 82665 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No. -603 Year-2025 Thana- BEUR District- Patna ====================================================== 1. Bhola Kumar @ Kaliya Son of Suraj Singh Resident of Vishunpur Pakari, P. S. - Beur, District- Patna 2. Satish Kumar Son of Late Ganga Choudhary Resident of Badi Khagaul Mushari, P. S. - Khagaul, District- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Ms. Usha Kumari Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Binod Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 2 03-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioners seek bail in connection with Beur P. S. Case No.
603 of 2025 instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a), 32(ii) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. 3. The prosecution case, in short, is that total 919. 05 litres of liquor was recovered from pickup vehicle. It is further alleged that two cars were also recovered from the spot. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 82665 of 2025(2) dt. 03-12-2025 2/3 possession of the petitioners. Learned counsel further submitted that petitioners are in no manner connected with the vehicles in question or with the alleged recovery of liquor. The petitioner no. 1 is in custody since 22. 10. 2025 and petitioner no. 2 is in custody since 18. 10. 2025. Petitioner no. 1 has three criminal antecedent whereas petitioner no. 2 has no criminal antecedent.
There is no compliance of Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. 5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioners. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as also the period of custody undergone by the petitioners, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners. 7. Let the petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- ( Rupees Fifteen Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Beur P. S. Case No. 603 of 2025, subject to the following conditions: (I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the family of the petitioner. (II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 82665 of 2025(2) dt.
03-12-2025 3/3 consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner. (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Alok Verma/- U T
Source: Patna High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.