S.MADHIYAZHAGAN v. THE BRANCH MANAGER
Court: Madras High Court
Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN
Judgment date:
Case summary
Madras High Court judgment dated 2025-12-17. S.MADHIYAZHAGAN v. THE BRANCH MANAGER. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
WP No. 47945 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 17-12-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN WP No. 47945 of 2025 and WMP No. 53540 of 2025 S. Madhiyazhagan Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Branch Manager Tamil Nadu Industrial Investment Corporation Ltd, nd C. S. Sengottiah Complex, 2 Floor, 23, Chidambaram Colony, 80 Feet Road, Periyar Nagar, Erode 638 001. 2. The Sub Registrar Kangayam Sub Registrar Office, Andimadikkadu, Kangayam, Tirupur 638 701. 3. The Sub Registrar Vellakovil Sub Registrar Office No. 199/197A, K. P. C. Nagar, Vellakovil, Tirupur 638 111. Respondent(s) PRAYER Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to st issue writ of Mandamus, directing the 1 respondent to issue discharge receipts relating to the entries made vide Document Nos. 1134 of 1993 and Document https://www. mhc. tn. gov. in/judis WP No. 47945 of 2025 nd rd No.
901 of 1995 in the office of the 2 and 3 respondents herein respectively, relating to the properties of the petitioner comprised in S. Nos. 30 and 31 (New S. Nos. 467 and 468), measuring a total extent of 8. 48 acres situate at Pachchapalayam Village, Kangeyam Taluk, Tirupur District. For Petitioner(s): Mr. A. Sundaravadhanam For Mr. S. Thangavel For Respondent(s): Mr. Md. Sulaiman For R1 Mr. Stalin Abhimanyu Additional Government Pleader For R2 to R3 ORDER The petitioner has come forward with this writ petition seeking for a st direction to the 1 respondent to issue discharge receipts towards the mortgage deed and Document No. 1134 of 1993 on the file of Kangeyam Sub Registrar and the Document No. 901 of 1995 on the file of Sub Registrar, Vellakoil. 2. When the matter came up for admission, Mr. Mohamed Sulaiman, st learned counsel took notice for the 1 respondent and Mr. Stalin Abhimanyu, learned Additional Government Pleader took notice for the respondents 2 and 3. Mr.
Mohamed Sulaiman sought time to produce the receipts. Accordingly, https://www. mhc. tn. gov. in/judis WP No. 47945 of 2025 yesterday he produced the receipt for the Document No. 1134 of 1993. He had not produced the receipt for Document No. 901 of 1995. Hence, the matter was posted for today. 3. When the matter was taken up, Mr. Mohamed Sulaiman has filed a typed set of papers enclosing the letters to the respondents 2 and 3 as well as the receipt dated 15. 12. 2025. st 4. Mr. Sulaiman states that the petitioner has to approach the 1 respondent for receiving the original and thereafter has to to produce it before st the respondents 2 and 3 for registering the same. He also states that the 1 respondent has informed the respondents 2 and 3 by way of letter dated st 15. 12. 2025 that the presence of 1 respondent is not essential, as it is exempted under Section 88(1) of the Registration Act, 1908. The letter as well as the receipt are scanned and extracted hereunder: https://www. mhc.
tn. gov. in/judis WP No. 47945 of 2025 https://www. mhc. tn. gov. in/judis WP No. 47945 of 2025 st 4. Mr. Sulaiman states that the petitioner has to approach the 1 respondent for receiving the original and thereafter has to to produce it before st the respondents 2 and 3 for registering the same. He also states that the 1 https://www. mhc. tn. gov. in/judis WP No. 47945 of 2025 respondent has informed the respondents 2 and 3 by way of letter dated st 15. 12. 2025 that the presence of 1 respondent is not essential, as it is exempted under Section 88(1) of the Registration Act, 1908. The letter as well as the receipt are scanned and extracted hereunder: https://www. mhc. tn. gov. in/judis WP No. 47945 of 2025 https://www. mhc. tn. gov. in/judis WP No. 47945 of 2025 https://www. mhc. tn. gov. in/judis WP No. 47945 of 2025 st 5. The petitioner shall approach the 1 respondent and receive the original.
On production of the same before the respondents 2 and 3, they shall st register the same without insisting on the presence of the 1 respondent. 6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. 17-12-2025 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No Jeni https://www. mhc. tn. gov. in/judis
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.