SUSHILA DEVI v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
Court: High Court of Rajasthan
Bench: VINIT KUMAR MATHUR,BHUWAN GOYAL
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Rajasthan judgment dated 2026-08-10. SUSHILA DEVI v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
[2026:RJ-JP:38028-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR D. B. Habeas Corpus Petition No. 485/2026 CNR: RJHC010801242026 | URN: HC / 770U / 2026 Sushila Devi W/o Prabhu Ram, Aged About 43 Years, Resident Of Meghwal Vas, Rajpura, Po Balda, District Sirohi, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Home Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Superintendent Of Police, District Sirohi Raj. 3. The Station House Officer, Police Station Sirohi Sadar, District Sirohi Rajasthan. 4. Dinesh S/o Shri Jethaji, Resident Of Village Nerwa, Tehsil And District Sirohi Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pritam Solanki For Respondent(s) : Mr. Deepak Choudhary, GA-cum-AAG Mr. Bhagwan Singh, SI Mr. Jagdish Kumar, HC-618 Ms. Janukumari, MFC Mr. Arjun Singh, HC-371, P. S. Sirhoi, Sadar, District Sirohi. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL Order 10/08/2026 1.
Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The present habeas corpus petition has been filed by the petitioner, who is the mother of the corpus Mst. ‘J’ stating therein that the corpus Mst. ‘J’ is in illegal detention of the respondent No. 4. [2026:RJ-JP:38028-DB] (2 of 2) [HC-485/2026] 3. In pursuance of the directions issued by this court, the corpus Mst. ‘J’ has been produced before this Court. 4. We have conferred with the corpus Mst. ‘J’. She stated that th she is 23 years of age, having educational qualification of 10 class, who understands her well being quite well. She stated before us that she has solemnized marriage with the respondent No. 4 of her own free will and she is living with him happily without any pressure from any side. She stated that she is not in illegal detention of any person including respondent No. 4. 5. In view of the statements made by the corpus Mst. ‘J’ before us, this Court is convinced that the corpus Mst.
‘J’ is not in illegal detention of any person including respondent No. 4. 6. The present habeas corpus petition is, therefore, fails, and the same is hereby dismissed. 7. The investigating agency is directed to see to it that the corpus Mst. ‘J’ reaches her residence safely. (BHUWAN GOYAL),J (VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J 1/Nitin Prajapat
Source: High Court of Rajasthan. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.