Akhilesh Rai @ Akhilesh Kumar v. The State of Bihar
Court: Patna High Court
Bench: MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
Judgment date:
Case summary
Patna High Court judgment dated 2024-12-06. Akhilesh Rai @ Akhilesh Kumar v. The State of Bihar. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 76411 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No. -186 Year-2024 Thana- SONEPUR District- Saran ====================================================== Akhilesh Rai @ Akhilesh Kumar Son of Late Keshav Rai Resident of Sabalpur Newal Tola, P. S. - Sonepur, Distt. - Saran ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh No. I, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nand Kishore Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 3 06-12-2024 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A. P. P. for the State. 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. 3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that inadvertently at para-3 of the anticipatory bail application, it has been pleaded that petitioner has one antecedent when petitioner has antecedent of three cases and allegation is of recovery of 10 litres of liquor from a bush. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was not arrested from the spot as such nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and even alleged recovery is from a place which does not belong to the petitioner and is accessible to public at large and he came to be implicated at the instance of Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 76411 of 2024(3) dt. 06-12-2024 2/2 Chowkidar with whom he is on an inimical term. It is also submitted that it appears that the police, in order to save the real culprit, falsely implicated the petitioner because of his antecedents. 5. Learned A. P. P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. 6.
Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Sonepur P. S. Case No. 186 of 2024 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr. P. C. 7. It is made clear that the learned trial court before accepting the bail bonds of the petitioner shall verify the criminal antecedents of the petitioner and in the event if it is found that the petitioner has antecedent of more than three cases, in that event, the present anticipatory bail order shall not be given effect to. (Satyavrat Verma, J) SUMIT/- U T
Source: Patna High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.