D. Veeresham v. The State of Telangana
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: CHALLA KODANDA RAM
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2020-12-08. D. Veeresham v. The State of Telangana. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM WRIT PETITION No. 22343 OF 2020 Between: D. Veeresham, S/o. Ramanadham, Aged about 59 years, Occ. Nil, R/o. Goudavelli Village and Gram Panchayat, tr/edchal l\rlandal, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, ... PET|T|ONER AND 1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Panchayat Raj Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad 2. The District Collector, Medchal-Malkajgiri District. 3. The District Panchayat Officer, Ir/edcha l-Malkajgiri District 4. The Divisional Officer Panchayat Officer, Medchal-l/alkajgiri, Medchal-lr/alkajgiri District. (Erstwhile Ranga Reddy District). 5. The Mandal Parisand Development Officer, Medchal, Medchal-Malkajgiri District. 6. The Panchayat Secretary, Medchal-Mandal Gram Panchayat, Medchal Mandal, lr/edchal-Malkajgiri District. 7. G. Surendar, S/o.
Chandraiah, Aged about 40 years, Occ. Sarpanch, PJo. Goudavalli, I\,4edcha l-lr/a lkajgiri District. 8. Abzal Begum, W/o. Late Ashabir Ali, Aged about 70 years, Occ. Railway Employee, R/o. Goudavelli Village and Gram Panchayat, Medchal Mandal, IVedchal-lr/alka. igiri District. ... RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumslances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or direction more particularly one in lhe nature of Writ of l\rlandamus declaring the action of respondent Nos. 3 to 6 rn non-considering the representatron the petitioner and non-taking the action against the illegal house construct on the public road by the respondent No.
8 by illegally, without taking permissions from the concerned authorities ls highly illegal, arbitrary u nconstitutiona l, unjust and in violation of Principles of Natural Justice an also in violation of Articles 14, 19 and 21 and 300-4 of the Constitution o lndia and consequently direct the respondent No. 6 to consider my representation and to take the action against the illegal construction by the respondent No. 8 on the public road without taking any valid permissions from the concerned authorities. lA NO: 't OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No. 6 to consider the representation of the petitioner and to take the action against the illegal construction by the respondent No. 8 on the public road without taking any valid permissions from the concerned authorities, pending disposal of the writ petition.
Counsel forthe Petitioner: SRI RAPOLU BHASKAR Counsel for the Respondent Nos, 1 to 4: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEVELOPMENT Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 5&6: SRI G. NARENDER REDDY, STANDING COUNSEL FOR GRAM PANCHAYAT Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 7&8: NONE APPEARED The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON'BLE SRIJUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM WRIT PETITION No. 22343 of 2020 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh writ petition by impleaing necessary parties Permission is accorded and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs SD/. N. CHANDRA SEKHAR RAO I ASSISTANT REGIST R ,TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. One CC to Sri. Rapolu Bhaskar, Advocate IOPUC] 2. One C. C. to Sri. G.
Narender Reddy, Standing Counsel for Grampanchayat (oPUC) 3. Two CCs to GP for Panchayat Raj & Rural Development, High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUT] 4. Two CD Copies Prk ry/ HIGH COURT DArED:0811212020 IHE SI4 * o k o t 16 0EC2020 z f * * cO P. :, 'l ORDER WP. No. 22343 ot 2020 Dismissing the WP as withdrawn without costs. \N bcoP;e5 )rrq\'[-*
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.