Vadla Balaswamy v. State of Telangana
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: SHAMEEM AKTHER
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2020-12-29. Vadla Balaswamy v. State of Telangana. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY ,THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY PRESENT THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER WRIT PETITION NO: 3297 OF 2020 Between: 1. Vadla Balaswamy, S/o Kalappa aged about 51 years Occ. Carpenter r/o H. No. 5-4-llEilA, Shivashakthi Nagar Mahaboobnagar. r/o 2. Vadla Narsimulu, s/o Kalappa aged about 53 years Occ. carpentor H,No. 5-4-1lE1lA, Shivashakthi Nagar Mahaboobnagar. 55 years Occ 3. Vadla Janakamma, D/o Kalappa aged about House wite r/o H. No. 5-4-1lE1l A,shivashakthi Nagar [vlahaboobnagar' . ,. PETITIONERS AND 1. State of Telangana, rep by its Principal Secretary. Revenue Department Secretariat, Hyderabad 2. The District Collector, Ivlahaboobnagar Dist 3. The Joint collector, Mahaboobnagar Dist. +. The Reuenue Divisional Offer, Mahaboobnagar, Mahabobnaar Dist 5. The Tahasildar, Jadcherla Mandal, Mahaboobnagar Dist' 6 [vl. srinivas Reddy, S/o tr/.
Krishna reddy aged about 51 years Occ. business 7. M. Sridhar Reddy, s/o M. krishna Reddy aged about 48 years Occ' Business Both are R/o Nagsala village, Jadcherla Mandal Mahaboobnagar District ... RESPONDENTS praying that in the Petition under Article 226 of lhe constitution of lndia circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in non deleting the names of the respondent No. 6 and 7 and cancelling the pass books for the land in survey No. 652 extent ac 5. 37 gts situated at Nasurullabad village, Jadcherla Mandal, Mahaboobnagar District and thereby issuing the endJrsement vide No. Bl1g1gt17 dated7. 2. 2020 as arbitrary and illegal and contrary to the order passed by the respondent No. 2 vide Compt No F2llA- O1l2O1g dated 17. 1 .
2020, order passed by the respondent No 3 vide BtRORt2212t2013, order passed by the respondent No' 4 vide file No F2t11-O1l2}1g daled 22. 11. 2019 an in violation of the procedure prescribed under Telangana Rights in lands an Pattedar pass books Act 1971 consequently set aside the endorsement and direct the respondent No. 5 to delete ihe nimes of the respondents No. 6 and 7 from the revenue records. lA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No. 5 to delete the names of the respondent No. 6 and 7 from the records and to cancel the pass books for the land in survey No. 652 extent ac 5. 37 gts situated at Nasurullabad village, Jadcherla lt4andal, lvlahaboobnagar District without reference to the No. B11959117 daied 7. 2. 2020 pending disposal of the above writ petition. lA NO: 2 OF 2020 Between: 1. N/. Srinivas Reddy, S/o M.
Krishna reddy aged about 51 years Occ. business 2. tM. Sridhar Reddy, s/o M. krishna Reddy aged about 48 years Occ. Business Both are Ri/o Nagasala village, Jadcherla Mandal Mahaboobnagar District. .... Petitioners/Respondents 6 & 7 AND 1. Vadla Balaswamy, S/o Kalappa, 2. Vadla Narsimulu, S/o Kalappa, 3. Vadla Janakamma, D/o Kalappa, ... Respondents/Petitioners 4. The State of Telangana, rep. by its Principal Secretary Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 5. The District Collector, Ivlahabubnagar Dist. 6. The Joint Collector, Mahabubnagar Dist. 7. The Revenue Divisronal Officer, Mahabubnagar, Mahabubnagar District. 8. The Tahsildar, Jadcherla Nilandal, lvlahabubnagar District. . . . Res po nde nts/Res pon de nts Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders dated 17-02-2020 passed in W. P. No.
3297 of 2020, pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI G. MADHUSUOHAN REDDY Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 5: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 6 & 7: SRI A. GIRIDHAR RAO The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON,BLE DT. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER WRIT PETITION No. 3297 of 2O2O ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioners filed a letter, dated 28. 12. 2020 in the Registry seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition. 2. Perm ission is accorded, 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dlsmissed as withdrawn. lYiscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs. SD/. K. VENKAIAH ASSISTANT REGISTRAR \ //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. One CC to Sri G. Madhusudhan Reddy, Advocate IOPUC] 2. One CC to Sri A. Giridhar Rao, Advocate [OPUC] 3. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT] 4.
Two CD Copies SM cl HIGH COURT DATED:2911212020 1 HE tA o o 0 6 JAt'l 2021 . L ORDER i * o WP. No. 3297 ol 2020 T" DISMISSING THE WP AS WITHDRAWN, WITHOUT COSTS \
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.