Skip to main content
LawSphereX

UMESH KUMAR v. SANJEEV BHATNAGAR AND ANOTHER

Court: High Court of Himachal Pradesh

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP SHARMA

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court of Himachal Pradesh judgment dated 2020-03-03. UMESH KUMAR v. SANJEEV BHATNAGAR AND ANOTHER. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.

Judgment text

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CMPMO No. 167 of 2020 rd Date of Decision: 3 March, 2020 __________________________________________________________ Dr. Umesh Kumar ……. Petitioner Versus Sanjeev Bhatnagar & another ….. Respondents __________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. 1 Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioner : Ms. Ruchi Kumari, Advocate. For the Respondent:Mr. Sudhir Bhatnagar, Mr. Arvind Sharma and Mr. Anil Jaswal, Additional Advocates Generals, with Mr. Kunal Thakur, Deputy Advocate General. ____________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge (oral): By way of present petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, petitioner has sought a direction to the Officer on Special Duty, Erstwhile H. P. State Administrative Tribunal, to send the record of COPC No. 259/2019 in Original Application No. 2013/2017, to this Court. 2. Mr.

Sudhir Bhatnagar, learned Additional Advocate General, on instructions states that since all the files Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? pending before the Erstwhile H. P. State Administrative Tribunal stand transferred to this Court, present petition is not maintainable. 3. Consequently, in view of the above, learned counsel representing the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw the present petition at this stage with liberty to file afresh at appropriate stage, if required and desired. 4. Accordingly, in view of the aforesaid prayer having been made by learned counsel representing the petitioner, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty reserved to the petitioner to file afresh at appropriate stage, if required and desired. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge rd 3 March, 2020 (shankar)

Source: High Court of Himachal Pradesh. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.