SANEESH v. LAKSHMI
Court: High Court of Kerala
Bench: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALEXANDER THOMAS
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Kerala judgment dated 2020-12-21. SANEESH v. LAKSHMI. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALEXANDER THOMAS MONDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2020 / 30TH AGRAHAYANA, 1942 Crl. MC. No. 8202 OF 2016 M. P. NO. 123/2016 IN M. C. NO. 56/2016 ON THE FILE OF FAMILY COURT, IRINJALAKUDA PETITIONER/COUNTER PETITIONER: SANEESH AGED 31 YEARS S/O. RADHAMANI, 'ASWATHI SADANAM', KOTTAMKARA MANGATTU DESOM, KOLLAM TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SRI. PREMCHAND M. SMT. P. M. PRINCY LAL SRI. C. S. SUMESH RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT & STATE: 1 LAKSHMI, AGED 31 YEARS D/O. MURALEEDHARAN, KANAKKAPARAMBIL HOUSE, ANNANAD DESOM, KATHUR VADAKKUMURY VILLAGE, CHAVAKKAD TALUK 680 506. 2 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM 31. SRI. SAIGI JACOB PALATTY, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 21. 12. 2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Crl. M. C No. 8202 of 2016 ALEXANDER THOMAS, J. =========================== Crl. M. C No.
8202 of 2016 =========================== st Dated this the 21 day of December, 2020 ORDER The prayers in the aforecaptioned Crl. M. C filed under Sec. 482 of the Cr. P. C are as follows : “i. Set aside Annexure 2 Order dated 15/06/2016 in M. P. No. 123/2016 in M. C. No. 56/2016 passed by the Family Court, Irinjalakuda. ii. Grant such other relief deemed fit and proper to this Hon'ble Court. ” 2. The above Crl. M. C has been filed as early as on 23. 11. 2016. Thereafter, both sides have not cared to apprise this Court about any of the subsequent developments in the matter. 3. However, it is indeed heartening to note that at least at this last stage, Sri. M. Premchand, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit on the basis of instructions that the above petition has become infructuous, as the disputes between the parties have been settled out of court and that the Crl. M. C may be dismissed as infructuous. Recording the abovesaid submissions of the petitioner, the above Crl. M.
C will stand dismissed as infructuous. Sd/- ALEXANDER THOMAS JUDGE vgd
Source: High Court of Kerala. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.