Hepavath Ramesh and Another v. The State of Telangana
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: K.LAKSHMAN
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2020-12-15. Hepavath Ramesh and Another v. The State of Telangana. Read the judgment and case details on...
Judgment text
[ ] IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY ,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF DECEIVBER TWO THOUSAND AND-TWENTY :PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 6679 OF 2020 Between: 1. Hepavath Ramesh, S/o. Huniya, 2. Kanipakam Mani, S/o. Kumar, Petitioners/Accused 3 & 4 -? /- AND The State of Telangana, through the SHO, Bhongir Rural Police Station, Bhongir, Yadadri Bhongir District, Rep. by the Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad for the State of Telangana and the State of Andhra Pradesh. --. / RespondenUComplainant Petition under Section 438 of Cr,P. C, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed in support of the Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent to release the petitioners on bail in the event of their arrest in connection with Cr. No.
21512020 on the file of Station House Officer, Bhongir Rural PS pending enquiry and trial,; The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the grounds filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/s PILLIX LAW FIRM Advocate for the Petitioners and PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the Respondent, the /'- Court made the following. ORDER: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN CRIMINAL PETITION No. 6679 OF 2O2O ORDER: This is an application for anticipatory bail. The petitioners herein are accused Nos. 3 and 4 in Crime No. 215 of 2019 on the 1l1e of Station House Officer, Bhongir Rural P. S. The oifence alleged against the petitioners is under Section 34 (E)TSEA. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Public' Prosecutor. Perused the record. 3. It appears from the remand report that basrng or-r the confession statement of A-2, the respondent officials have included the n ames of the petitioners herein in the presernt cr1me. 4.
Learned counsei for the petitioners rvould submit that A-3 is the' brother of A-2 and A-4 is the driver of A'. 3 The police havi: arrested A-1 and A-2 and they u'ere enlarged t on bail. A-2 has purchased black jaggery and a-1um and in I prool of the szL. re, he has filed bill dated 19. 07. 2020 of 'Sai I Traders' and also tax receipt dated 19. 07. 2O2O rn proof of purchase ol the said material by A-2. 5. Conr;idering the said aspects and also the fact that I the A- I and A-. 2 were already arrested and enlarged on bai1, \ this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners herein, 6. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is allowed and the petitioners are granted anticipatory bail subject to the following conditions: (i) The petitioners/ accused Nos. 3 and 4 are directed to surrender before the Bhongir Rural P. S.
u,ithin a period of trvo (2) weeks from toda1,, and or-r such surrender, the said Station House Officer shal1 release the petitioners on bail on their executing a personal bond each for a sum ol Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand oniy) with two sureties each to the like sum each to his satisfaction. (ii) The petitioners/accused Nos. 3 and 4 shal1 abide by the other conditions stipulated in Section 438(2) Cr. P. C. and co-operate with the Investigating Officer in investigating the case. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand disposed of. i I sd/- M. ]'IANJUL. T I I ASSISTAN ! REGISTTLa. R COPY// /[RUE OFFICER SECTION '. iff#if*ilq;;;ff :j::,:;",::,,'. :_flH,$$Lltt|fffi (oUT) " Hyderabad '""-i"r,ts"tt' \ coPY 5. OnelPEe HIGH COURT KL,J DATED: L5. 72. 2O2O ,- . '\^ 1z-'i;t ORDER I 3\il +ll !. 'll ss ,s-// ar:, // v,"rz CRLP. NO: OAZ{-ot ZOZo ( CRIMINAL PETITION IS ALLOWED
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.