V.BASKAR v. MUNIYAPPAN
Court: Madras High Court
Bench: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP
Judgment date:
Case summary
Madras High Court judgment dated 2024-12-21. V.BASKAR v. MUNIYAPPAN. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
CMP NO. 26889 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 21-12-2024 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP CMP NO. 26889 of 2024 AND AS NO. 665 OF 2019,CMP NO. 19966 OF 2019 V. Baskar S/O. Vaiyapuri, D. No. 517, Raja Nagar, 5th Ward, Kombaipatti Main Road, GoriMedu, Salem-8 Appellant(s) Vs MUNIYAPPAN S/O. U. Karippaiah,D. No. 62/26, Rathinapuri, Gorimedu, Salem-8 Respondent(s) AS NO. 665 of 2019 MUNIYAPPAN S/o Karuppaiya,D. No. 62/26, Rathinapuri, Gorimedu, Salem- 636008 Appellant(s) Vs V. Baskar S/o Karuppaiya,D. No. 62/26, Rathinapuri, Gorimedu, Salem- 636008 Respondent(s) CMP NO. 19966 of 2019 MUNIYAPPAN S/o Karuppaiya,D. No. 62/26, Rathinapuri, Gorimedu, Salem- 636008 Appellant(s) Vs V. Baskar S/o Karuppaiya,D. No. 62/26, Rathinapuri, Gorimedu, Salem-https://www. mhc. tn. gov. in/judis 636008 Respondent(s) CMP NO. 26889 of 2024 For Appellant(s): R. Muralidharan S. Venkidusamy For Respondent(s): AS NO. 665 of 2019 For Appellant(s): M/s. R.
MuralidharanS. VenkidusamyFor Sole Respondent For Respondent(s): CMP NO. 19966 of 2019 For Appellant(s): M/s. S. GunalanA. Panneer Selvam For Caveator (t/e For Respondent(s): ORDER This Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to return Ex. B-4 marked in O. S. No. 155 of 2016 before the learned II Additional District Judge, Salem and substitute the same in A. S. No. 665 of 2019. 2. The learned Counsel for the Respondent objected to return of document on the ground that the Petitioner had not stated the reasons seeking return of original document under Ex. B-4. https://www. mhc. tn. gov. in/judis 3. Also, it is the contention of the learned Counsel for the second Respondent that there is apprehension that the Petitioner is attempting to encumber the property. 4. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner submitted that he is ready to give an undertaking that the property under Ex. B-4 will not be encumbered during the pendency of Appeal and also he produced the certified copy of Ex. B-4.
4. In the light of the apprehension expressed by the learned Counsel for the Respondent and in the light of undertaking given by the learned Counsel for the Petitioner that the property under Ex. B-4 will not be encumbered during the pendency of the Appeal and also given undertaking that the original document under Ex. B-4 will be produced before the trial Court as and when required, Registry is directed to return Ex. B-4 to the learned Counsel for the Petitioner. If there is any violation of condition, the contempt will be initiated against the parties concerned. In the result, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is allowed. 21-12-2024 dh CMP NO. 26889 of 2024 To https://www. mhc. tn. gov. in/judis1. MUNIYAPPAN S/O. U. Karippaiah,D. No. 62/26, Rathinapuri, Gorimedu, Salem-8 AS NO. 665 of 2019 1. V. Baskar S/o Karuppaiya,D. No. 62/26, Rathinapuri, Gorimedu, Salem-636008 CMP NO. 19966 of 2019 1. V. Baskar S/o Karuppaiya,D. No. 62/26, Rathinapuri, Gorimedu, Salem-636008 https://www. mhc.
tn. gov. in/judis
Source: Madras High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.