Thallapally Bharath @ Charan v. The State of Telangana,
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: JUVVADI SRIDEVI
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2025-02-24. Thallapally Bharath @ Charan v. The State of Telangana,. Read the judgment and case details on...
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA MONDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE :PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE JUVVADI SRIDEVI CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2652 OF 2025 Between: Thallapally Bharath @ Charan, S/o. Ganga Narsaiah, Age. 33 years, Occ. Business, R/o. H. No. '1-2011 , Pagidi Madugu (V), Korutla (M), Jagithyala Dist. , Telangana. .... Petitioner/Accused AND 1. The State of Telangana,, Rep by its Public Prosecutors, High CoArt at Hyderabad for The State of Telangana. ..... Respondent 2. Kota Nandini, W/o. Kota Sateesh, Age. 36 Years, Caste. Chowdary (OC), Occ. Business, R/o. H. No. 5-76, Ranga Nagar Colony, Ganesh Nagar Bus Stop, Chintal, Quthbullapur, lt/edchal-Malkajgiri Dist. , Telangana. ..... RespondenU Defacto-Complainant Petition under Section 528 of BNSS, praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the S. C. No.
77l2O24 on the file of the Court of the ll Addl. Metropolitian Session Judge, at Medchal. The petition/Appeal coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of B. Hemanth Kumar, Advocate for the Petitioner and Sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla. Additional Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana and None appeared for Respondent No. 2. THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING ORDER: r THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE JUWADISRIDEVI CRIMINAL PETITION No. 2652 ot 2025 ORDER This Criminal Petition is filed by the petitioner-accused I seeking to quash the proceedings against him in S. C. No. 77 ol I 2024 pending on the file of the learned trial Court 02. Heard Sri T. P. Acharya, learned counsel, representing Sri B. Hemanth Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State 03.
Though this Criminal Petition is filed for quashing the I , proceedings, during the course of arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner has restricted his prayer to the extent of dispensing with the presence of the petitioner before the learned trial Court. 04. Considering the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Criminal Petition is disposed of dispensing with the appearance of the petitioner-accused before the learned trial Court unless his presence is specifically required during the course of trial, subject to the condition of the petitioner-accused being represented by his learned counsel on every date of hearing. ln case of non-appearance of the petitioner-accused on :-rt:, the specific date so flxed by the learned trial Court for appearance, this Order gets vacated automatically As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, Sd/. N. SRIHARI shall stand closed. SI TANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// I SECTION OFFICER To, 1.
The Vlll Additional Metropolitan Magistrate at Medchal, Cyberabad, Medchal Malkajgiri District. 2. The Station House Officer, Jeedimetla Police Station, Cyberabad, Medchal N/alkajgiri District 3. One CC to Sri. B. Hemanth Kumar, Advocate [OPUC] 4. Two CC to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad. [OPT] 5. Two CD Copies. PSK/gh @ HIGH COURT I DATED:2410212025 I l I I I r HF- S14 14, I o Qr' I t I ORDER q I r: '\ -) o t) t 20fi ,l CRLP. No. 2652 ot 2025 29 ilt tl i DISPOSED OF THE CRIMINAL PETITION
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Archive: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.