Ashok Kr. Das and another v. The State of Tripura and 2 others
Court: High Court of Tripura
Bench: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE T. AMARNATH GOUD
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Tripura judgment dated 2024-09-23. Ashok Kr. Das and another v. The State of Tripura and 2 others. Read the judgment and case details on...
Judgment text
HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AGARTALA WP(C) No. 598 of 2024 Ashok Kr. Das & Anr. ………Petitioner(s) Versus The State of Tripura & Ors. …….. Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. P Roy Barman, Sr. Advocate Mr. K. Chakraborty, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Mr. D. Bhattacharya, Sr. Advocate. Mr. M. Debbarma, Addl. GA. HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE T. AMARNATH GOUD ORDER 23. 09. 2024 This present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following reliefs:- “i. Issue rule calling upon the respondents and each one of them to show cause as to why a Writ of Mandamus and/or in the nature thereof shall not be issued, mandating/directing them to fix the respective Past Pays of the petitioners at Rs. 1,20,500/-( in terms of Sl. No.
36, Pay Level -12 of the Tripura State Pay Matrix 2018), at par with the above mentioned similarly situated retired employees and thereupon to modify the respective PPOs of the petitioners accordingly, thereby releasing all consequential benefits flowing there from (including monthly pension and other post retiral benefits ) along with arrears thereof. ii. Call for the records, appertaining to this writ petition. iii. After hearing the parties be pleased to make the rule absolute in terms of (i) above. iv. Cost of and incidental to this proceedings”. [2] Heard learned counsel appearing for the respective parties. [3] It is seen from record that the petitioners herein submitted representations dated 09. 07. 2024 separately before the concerned respondents ventilating their grievances, but the same remains pending till date.
[4] In view of such circumstances, without expressing any opinion on the merits of this case, this writ petition is disposed of directing the concerned respondents to consider the representations dated 09. 07. 2024 made by the petitioners as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of 03 (three) months from the date of receipt of the copy of this order in accordance with law. With the above observation and direction, this present writ petition stands disposed of. As a sequel, miscellaneous application(s), pending if any, shall stand closed. JUDGE Sabyasachi G.
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.