PRIMARY AGRICULTURE CREDIT CO OPERATIVE v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
Court: High Court of Karnataka
Bench: P.S.DINESH KUMAR
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Karnataka judgment dated 2020-12-16. PRIMARY AGRICULTURE CREDIT CO OPERATIVE v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA. Read the judgment and case details on...
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU TH DATED THIS THE 16 DAY OF DECEMBER, 2020 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P. S. DINESH KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO. 1441/2020 (CS-EL/M) BETWEEN: PRIMARY AGRICULTURE CREDIT CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD, NELLIGERE BELLURU HOBLY, NAGAMANGALA TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT-571418 REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER ... PETITIONER (By SHRI. H K KENCHEGOWDA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF CO OPERATION M S BUILDING DR B R AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU-560001 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY 2. THE STATE CO OPERATIVE ELECTION COMMISSON RD 3 FLOOR, T T M C A BLOCK SHANTHI NAGAR K H ROAD BANGALORE-560027 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE REGISTRAR OF CO OEPRATIVE SOCIETIES IN KARNATAKA NO. 1 ALI ASKAR ROAD BENGALURU-560001 4. THE ELECTION OFFICER AND DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES MANDYA DISTIRCT MANDYA-571401 5.
THE RETURNING OFFICER PRIMARY AGRICULTURE CREDIT CO OPERATIVE SOCIETIES PANDAVAPURA SUB DIVISION PANDAVAPURA MANDYA DISTRICT-571434 6. THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES PANDAVAPURA SUB DIVISION PANDAVAPURA, MANDYA DISTRICT-571434 7. THE CO OPERATIVE DEVELOPMENT OFFICER NAGAMANGALA TOWN NAGAMANGALA TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT-571432 ... RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SHARADAMBA A R, AGA FOR R1, R3 AND R6; SHRI. G. V. SHASHIKUMAR. ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT SECTION 20(2) (a-iv) (a-v) THE KARNATAKA CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT IS ULTRA VIRES THE LEGISLATIVE COMPETENCE AND ARTICLE 243Z1 AND 243ZO OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA AND ETC. , THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER Learned AGA submits that in this petition, petitioner has prayed for only voting rights.
Elections have been conducted and nothing further survives for consideration. Her submission is placed on record. 2. In the circumstance, this petition is dismissed as having become infructuous reserving liberty to petitioner to seek revival of the petition, if so advised. No costs. Sd/- JUDGE AV
Source: High Court of Karnataka. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.