SHARWAN KUMAR ALIAS SHARVAN KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
Court: High Court of Jharkhand
Bench: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Jharkhand judgment dated 2026-04-18. SHARWAN KUMAR ALIAS SHARVAN KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND. Read the judgment and case details on...
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 2300 of 2026 Sharwan Kumar @ Sharvan Kumar, son of Gopal Rai @ Gopal Roy, … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Birendra Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Nawin Kumar Singh, APP For the Informant : Ms. Nidhi Singh, Advocate --- 07/18. 04. 2026 Heard the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 11. 01. 2026 in connection with Koderma P. S. Case No. 234 of 2025, registered under Section 87 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, now pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Koderma. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as per the F. I. R. , the victim aged 17 years eloped with the petitioner. The date of incident is 28. 12. 2025 and ultimately, both of them came back and marriage was performed on 05. 01.
2026. He submits that the petitioner is in custody since 11. 01. 2026 and the F. I. R. was instituted on 29. 12. 2025 by the mother of the victim as the girl was found missing. 4. The learned counsel for the informant (mother of the victim) submits that the marriage was solemnized and the informant has no objection if the petitioner is enlarged on bail, so that the petitioner and victim may enjoy the conjugal life. 5. The learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail. 6. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances and particularly the fact that the informant also does not have any objection so far as prayer for bail of the petitioner is concerned and that the victim is said to have eloped with the petitioner , the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.
25,000/- (Rupees twenty-five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Koderma in connection with Koderma P. S. Case No. 234 of 2025, on the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be a close relative of the petitioner. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of even single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhaar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned trial court. 7. The instant application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. 8.
Let a copy of this order be communicated to the learned court concerned through “FAX/email”. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J. ) Date of Order: 18. 04. 2026 Vedanti Date of Uploading: 20. 04. 2026
Source: High Court of Jharkhand. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.