ABDUL RAHMAN, v. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, TIRUR,
Court: High Court of Kerala
Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED NIAS C.P.
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Kerala judgment dated 2024-08-05. ABDUL RAHMAN, v. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, TIRUR,. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMED NIAS C. P. TH MONDAY, THE 5 DAY OF AUGUST 2024 / 14TH SRAVANA, 1946 WP(C) NO. 24716 OF 2024 PETITIONER: ABDUL RAHMAN, AGED 65 YEARS S/O. SAIDHALIKUTTY HAJI, VELLARIYIL HOUSE, VENGALOOR, VENGALOOR POST, TIRUR TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 676102 BY ADV BINU V V VEETTIL VALAPPIL RESPONDENTS: 1 THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, TIRUR, THRIKANDIYOOR ROAD, TIRUR, MALAPPURAM, PIN - 676101 2 THE VILLAGE OFFICER, TALAKKAD VILLAGE OFFICE, M H NAGAR, THEKKAN KUTTOOR, VENGALOOR POST, TIRUR TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 676102 OTHER PRESENT: SMT. DEVI SHRI R. , GP THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 05. 08. 2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C) NO. 24716 OF 2024 MOHAMMED NIAS C. P. , J ========================== W. P(C) No.
24716 of 2024 ========================== th Dated this the 5 day of August, 2024 J U D G M E N T The petitioner, stated to be the owner of the property having an extent of 9. 77 ares of land comprised in Survey No. 205/4-20 of Tirur Taluk, in Talakkad Village in Malappuram District, has preferred Ext. P1 application under Form-6 of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act and Rules, 2008, (for short, the Act and the Rules) seeking change of user of the property in the data bank. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no orders have been passed on the statutory application so far. nd 3. Accordingly, there will be a direction to the 2 respondent Village Officer st to give sufficient inputs required under the Act and the Rules to the 1 respondent Revenue Divisional Officer or the officer authorised under Section 2(XVA) of the Act, st within two months from today.
On receipt of the same, the 1 respondent Revenue Divisional Officer/authorised officer will consider Ext. P1 application within two months thereafter and pass orders strictly in terms of the Act and the Rules. The writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- MOHAMMED NIAS C. P. JUDGE LU WP(C) NO. 24716 OF 2024 APPENDIX OF WP(C) 24716/2024 PETITIONER EXHIBITS : EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT, DATED 06/06/2024 // True Copy // PA To Judge
Source: High Court of Kerala. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.