CHENDANG SADDLE VILLAGE v. THE STATE OF NAGALAND AND 3 ORS
Court: Gauhati High Court
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAKHETO SEMA
Judgment date:
Case summary
Gauhati High Court judgment dated 2024-01-22. CHENDANG SADDLE VILLAGE v. THE STATE OF NAGALAND AND 3 ORS. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
Page No. # 1/2 GAHC020000092024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) KOHIMA BENCH Case No. : I. A. (Civil)/4/2024 CHENDANG SADDLE VILLAGE REPRESENTED BY THE CHAIRMAN CHENDANG SADDLE VILLAGE COUNCIL VERSUS THE STATE OF NAGALAND AND 3 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OFNAGALAND Advocate for the Petitioner : K TSUKRU Advocate for the Respondent : GOVT ADV NL BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAKHETO SEMA ORDER Date : 22-01-2024 Heard Mr. C. T. Jamir, learned Sr. counsel assisted by Mr. I. Imchen, learned counsel for the applicant. This application has been filed under Order 1, Rule-10(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 praying for impleadment of the Deputy Commissioner, Noklak, the Director Rural Development (RD) Nagaland and the Project Director, District Rural Development Agency (DRDA) Tuensang as respondent No. 5, 6 & 7 in W. P. (C) No. 330/2022. Page No.
# 2/2 The learned counsel submits that the Officers to be impleaded are necessary party for adjudicating the petition and therefore, it is essential to implead them. Mr. Moa Imchen, learned Sr. Government Advocate has no objection to the prayer for impleadment. In view of the submission made by the parties, the Deputy Commissioner, Noklak, the Director Rural Development (RD) Nagaland and the Project Director, District Rural Development Agency (DRDA), Tuensang are impleaded as respondent No. 5, 6 & 7 in the connected writ petition. I. A. (C) stands disposed. Sd/- JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Source: Gauhati High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.